1999
DOI: 10.1051/aas:1999400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarimetric imaging of large fields in radio astronomy

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce and compare schemes to form wide-field polarimetric images from radio-interferometric mosaic and single-dish observations. We concentrate on two schemes based on maximum entropy principles. One scheme deconvolves the four Stokes parameters jointly (simultaneously), the other deconvolves each Stokes parameter separately. We find that the two schemes do not produce substantially different results. Issues of wide-field polarimetric purity are also considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then applied a maximum entropy algorithm (Gull & Daniell 1978) to deconvolve all of the dirty maps. For 20 and 13 cm, the task MAXEN was employed; for 6 and 3 cm, we used the task PMOSMEM (Sault et al 1999) to deconvolve the Stokes I, Q, and U maps simultaneously. After that, we convolved the resultant models with synthesized beams of FWHM 26″×19″ for 20 cm, 16″×11″ for 13 cm, 15″×13″ for 6 cm, and 10″×8″ for 3 cm.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then applied a maximum entropy algorithm (Gull & Daniell 1978) to deconvolve all of the dirty maps. For 20 and 13 cm, the task MAXEN was employed; for 6 and 3 cm, we used the task PMOSMEM (Sault et al 1999) to deconvolve the Stokes I, Q, and U maps simultaneously. After that, we convolved the resultant models with synthesized beams of FWHM 26″×19″ for 20 cm, 16″×11″ for 13 cm, 15″×13″ for 6 cm, and 10″×8″ for 3 cm.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 20 and 13 cm these images were deconvolved using the CLEAN algorithm, while at 6 cm we used the PMOSMEM algorithm (Sault, Bock, & Duncan 1999). Q and U images in each waveband were then combined to form images of polarized intensity and polarized position angle; a correction for the Ricean bias was applied to these data.…”
Section: Observations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEM imaging algorithms have been in use for decades (e.g., Gull &Daniell 1978 andCornwell &Evans 1985), but because of early computational limitations, they are used infrequently compared to CLEAN. The theory behind polarimetric MEM was pioneered in several theoretical papers beginning in the 70s (Ponsonby 1973;Nityananda & Narayan 1983;Narayan & Nityananda 1986;Shevgaonkar 1987), but implementation on actual VLBI data has been limited to only a handful of studies since (Holdaway 1990;Holdaway & Wardle 1990;Sault et al 1999;Coughlan & Gabuzda 2012, 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%