2010
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1010.1171
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarimetric Remote Sensing of Solar System Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note the difference between the Anderson localization scheme and the recurrent scattering mechanism shown in Fig. 6, because the latter takes place in the microscopic scale while the former occurs in the mesoscopic scale 16 .…”
Section: Anderson Localization Of Lightmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note the difference between the Anderson localization scheme and the recurrent scattering mechanism shown in Fig. 6, because the latter takes place in the microscopic scale while the former occurs in the mesoscopic scale 16 .…”
Section: Anderson Localization Of Lightmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The radiative properties entering the RTE, including the scattering coefficient κ s , absorption coefficient κ a and phase function P (Ω , Ω) (where Ω and Ω denote incident and scattered directions, respectively), depend on the microstructures as well as the permittivity and permeability of the composing materials. In particular, for disordered media consisting of discrete scatterers, i.e., discrete disordered media (DDM), the radiative properties are usually theoretically predicted under the independent scattering approximation (ISA), i.e., in which each discrete inclusion is assumed to scatter electromagnetic waves independently as if no other inclusions exist, i.e., without any inter-scatterer interference effects [12][13][14][15][16]. ISA is valid only when the scatterers are far-apart from each other (i.e., the far-field assumption) and no interparticle correlations exist (i.e., independent scatterers) [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A survey of the available observations showed that polarimetric observations of the Galilean satellites with high accuracy in different spectral bands in the opposition region (α 2°), as well as in the whole range of phase angles accessible for Jupiter satellites (α < 12°), are extremely rare, and the behavior of the negative polarization, including its wavelength dependence, is still unknown in detail. Besides, there is a large scatter in the data obtained by different authors (see, e.g., Mishchenko et al 2010;Rosenbush et al 2015).…”
Section: Objectives Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the electric field vector component parallel to the scattering plane dominates the perpendicular component. The observed angular dependence of negative polarization for atmosphereless solar system bodies (ASSBs) and laboratory samples usually exhibits a negative polarization branch (NPB) that is almost parabolic with the minimum at approximately 5°− 15°, depending on the properties of the scattering surface (Geake & Geake 1990;Shkuratov et al 2002;Mishchenko et al 2010;Bagnulo et al 2011;Afanasiev et al 2014;Levasseur-Regourd et al 2015;Belskaya et al 2017). However, in some cases a strongly asymmetric NPB with the minimum centered at about 0°.5-2°i s observed.…”
Section: Characterizing the Europa Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%