2019
DOI: 10.3390/mi11010038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarizability-Dependent Sorting of Microparticles Using Continuous-Flow Dielectrophoretic Chromatography with a Frequency Modulation Method

Abstract: The separation of microparticles with respect to different properties such as size and material is a research field of great interest. Dielectrophoresis, a phenomenon that is capable of addressing multiple particle properties at once, can be used to perform a chromatographic separation. However, the selectivity of current dielectrophoretic particle chromatography (DPC) techniques is limited. Here, we show a new approach for DPC based on differences in the dielectrophoretic mobilities and the crossover frequenc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particles experiencing nDEP, in contrast, will be repelled from them and are continuously flushed out of the channel (Figure 1C). This electrode configuration differs from traditional DEP-FFF setups where electrodes at the bottom of the device are used to levitate particles on specific flow lines to achieve characteristic retention time [26,51,52] or guide them into specific outlets [53]. In DEP-FFF setups, the drag force does not compete with the dielectrophoretic force.…”
Section: Channel Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particles experiencing nDEP, in contrast, will be repelled from them and are continuously flushed out of the channel (Figure 1C). This electrode configuration differs from traditional DEP-FFF setups where electrodes at the bottom of the device are used to levitate particles on specific flow lines to achieve characteristic retention time [26,51,52] or guide them into specific outlets [53]. In DEP-FFF setups, the drag force does not compete with the dielectrophoretic force.…”
Section: Channel Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microfluidic device has been described in detail in a previous publication 33 . Briefly, the h = 80 µm high microfluidic channel is made out of PDMS, has a width of 2 mm and a length of about 17 cm.…”
Section: The Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 numerically showed the benefit of multiple trap-and-release cycles in DPC. In a previous publication, we demonstrated the capabilities of a design that combined multiple trap-and-release cycles with the advantage of changing the frequency 33 . The chromatographic separation allows to address particle mixtures with only small dielectric differences or distributed particle properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the combined-field separation area, work by Urdaneta and Smela showed separation of live and dead yeast cells, using different frequencies to preferentially attract each cell type to a different set of electrodes [31]. Similar techniques have been recently applied, taking advantage of multi-frequency signals (amplitude, frequency, or phase modulated) on a single electrode array to generate dissimilar DEP actuation forces on particles of interest to separate polystyrene microspheres based on size [32], algae cells based on lipid content [33], and MCF7 cancer cells from diluted blood [34]. Planar multifield configurations have also been extended to concentrate viruses, proteins, and bacteria [35].…”
Section: D Electrode Systems: Multiple-fields/multiple-frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%