2012 2nd International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry (CARPI) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/carpi.2012.6473360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pole type robot for distribution power line inspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In step-2, ARC-2 has two more energy consumption joints (h 121, h 141 ) than ARC-1, because the same reasons as in step-1, step-3, step-4, ARC-3 has one more energy consumption joint(h 23 ) than ARC-1, because the yew motion shaft of the joint(h 23 ) is not vertical. In every step, the energy consumption of ARC-1 is minimum because the driving torque of the proposed unit based on parallelogram structure has no relationship with the load moment equally applying on the unit, and is only determined by the load gravity applying on the unit, the driving torque of the ARC-2, ARC-3 conventional joint is determined by both the equivalent load moment and load gravity, as shown in (3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Obstacle-crossing Energy Consumption Contrasting Of the Inspection Robots Separately With Proposed And Conventional Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In step-2, ARC-2 has two more energy consumption joints (h 121, h 141 ) than ARC-1, because the same reasons as in step-1, step-3, step-4, ARC-3 has one more energy consumption joint(h 23 ) than ARC-1, because the yew motion shaft of the joint(h 23 ) is not vertical. In every step, the energy consumption of ARC-1 is minimum because the driving torque of the proposed unit based on parallelogram structure has no relationship with the load moment equally applying on the unit, and is only determined by the load gravity applying on the unit, the driving torque of the ARC-2, ARC-3 conventional joint is determined by both the equivalent load moment and load gravity, as shown in (3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Obstacle-crossing Energy Consumption Contrasting Of the Inspection Robots Separately With Proposed And Conventional Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The overhead power transmission line endures various unavoidable severe weather, such as high wind, high temperature, rain, frost, snow, haze, et al To ensure the normal operation, the line grids should be inspected and maintained regularly. 2 The conventional inspection methods are foot patrol with a telescope from the ground and helicopter-assisted, [3][4][5] which are tedious, slow, and inefficient. The real-time images of the line can not be provided clearly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground line inspector: The worker is equipped with optical equipment for the electrical transmission line inspection on foot. This approach is slow and there is a limitation on the inspector's viewing angle [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%