2021
DOI: 10.31078/jk1815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polemik Fungsi Sosial Tanah dan Hak Menguasai Negara Pasca UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012

Abstract: Riset ini mengkaji pertama, aspek pembentukan UU No.2/2012. Kedua, tafsir makna pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Ketiga, proses ganti kerugian pelepasan hak atas tanah untuk pembangunan. Terakhir, polemik putusan MK No. 50/PUU-X/2012. Temuan riset menunjukan, aspek prosedural pembentukan UU No. 2/2012, belum sesuai kaidah pembentukan peraturan perundangan yang berlaku. Begitu pula, konsepsi makna kepentingan umum  dan proses ganti rugi atas tanah masih jauh dari spirit UUPA Jo Pasal 33 UUD 1945. Pasca putus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Article 2 paragraph (4) UUPA also provides space for state control rights exercised by Indigenous Peoples and Autonomous regions with limitations in the form of not contradicting national interests, according to the provisions of Government Regulations (Sulaiman, 2021). This explicitly emphasizes that Article 2 paragraph (4) of the UUPA cannot be interpreted as state control in a personal sense but must be interpreted as state control rights in the context of public law.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Article 2 paragraph (4) UUPA also provides space for state control rights exercised by Indigenous Peoples and Autonomous regions with limitations in the form of not contradicting national interests, according to the provisions of Government Regulations (Sulaiman, 2021). This explicitly emphasizes that Article 2 paragraph (4) of the UUPA cannot be interpreted as state control in a personal sense but must be interpreted as state control rights in the context of public law.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State guarantees for MHA are also contained in Article 2 paragraph (4) of Law no. 6 of 1960 concerning the Basic Agrarian Regulations (hereinafter referred to as UUPA), in which the rights owned and attached to MHA are fundamental rights so that they must be protected by the state (Sulaiman, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Di satu sisi, pemerintah menegaskan hak kepemilikan tanah individu secara sah, namun di sisi lain, tugas pemerintah sebagai pelaksana kekuasaan sering kali mengharuskan pengorbanan nilai-nilai individu demi agenda pembangunan infrastruktur fisik. Kepentingan umum, yang didasarkan pada fungsi sosial tanah, sama pentingnya dengan kepentingan individu yang berkaitan dengan fungsi ekonomi tanah (Sulaiman, 2021;Heviliana, 2015). Ini berarti bahwa dalam situasi yang memerlukan untuk kepentingan umum, kepentingan individu dapat dikompromikan atau bahkan harus dikalahkan, dan hak milik atas tanah harus diserahkan (Sugianto & Leliya, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…In this particular instance, given the normative nature of the study, its focus will be limited to examining the implementation, supervision, and/or control mechanisms of the regulations outlined in a legal framework. This phenomenon can be attributed to its connection with the philosophical underpinnings of democracy, wherein governance is derived from and executed by the populace, with the ultimate aim of serving their interests (Sulaiman 2021). According to the description above, there is a single component or element encompassed within it.…”
Section: Review Of Mpr Decree No Ix/mpr/2001 On Agrarian Reform and N...mentioning
confidence: 99%