The location for the New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) construction involved in land disputes during the land acquisition process. The land acquisition will always lead to disputes or conflicts with the affected people. It is even more complicated if, in the development process, the ruling elite intervenes, external forces outside the local community that are not directly related to the development. This article deals with the question of the government's public perceptions of the legal polemic of land dispute settlement based on Law No.2 of 2012, and concentrates to examine a new model of land dispute resolution from the perspective of affected communities against NYIA. This research is normative-empirical based on primary and secondary data, namely a literature study, field study, using purposive sampling with interviews, FGD, observation, and qualitative descriptive analysis. The result showed the failure of formal litigation and non-litigation approaches offered by Law No.2 of 2012 to resolve the disputes fairly. Village discussions based on local wisdom as a new model for equitable land dispute resolution needs a political review of Law No. 2 of 2012. The new paradigm of agrarian reform must be based on customary law and local wisdom values in the 1945 Constitution and the Agrarian Law. Given recent controversies concerning land disputes, a law on reform and structuring the national agrarian structure, Agrarian conflict resolution law, and law of natural resources management for the community are urgently needed.

Riset ini mengkaji pertama, aspek pembentukan UU No.2/2012. Kedua, tafsir makna pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Ketiga, proses ganti kerugian pelepasan hak atas tanah untuk pembangunan. Terakhir, polemik putusan MK No. 50/PUU-X/2012. Temuan riset menunjukan, aspek prosedural pembentukan UU No. 2/2012, belum sesuai kaidah pembentukan peraturan perundangan yang berlaku. Begitu pula, konsepsi makna kepentingan umum  dan proses ganti rugi atas tanah masih jauh dari spirit UUPA Jo Pasal 33 UUD 1945. Pasca putusan MK, perlu legislatif review UU No. 2/2012, untuk mendekonstruksi makna “fungsi sosial tanah” agar sesuai falsafah Pasal 33 UUD 1945 dan UUPA. DPR harus segera menyelesaikan RUU Pembaruan dan Penataan Struktur Agraria, RUU Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria, dan RUU Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam, sebagai amanat  Tap MPR No. IX/2001 Jo Tap MPR No. V/2003. Pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum, harus diletakkan dalam spirit fungsi sosial tanah dan reformasi agraria demi mencapai kemakmuran yang sebesar-besarnya bagi rakyat.

ABSTRAKFokus utama pengabdian ini adalah mencerdaskan pemilih pemula dengan memberikan pengayaan materi pendidikan politik dikalangan siswa-siswi Madarasah Aliyah Muallimin dan Muallimat Yogyakarta sebagai kelompok sasaran dalam mengikuti pemilihan Presiden/Wakil dan para wakil rakyat di tahun 2019. Indikator bagi pemilih cerdas diasumsikan paling tidak : 1. Memahami jejak rekam para kontestan secara baik. 2. memahami visi-misi calon Presiden/Wakil, dan wakil rakyat dengan baik. 3. Memahami komitmen keberpihakan kontestan terhadap isu-isu kepentingan rakyat, isu anti korupsi dan non diskriminasi terhadap semua orang. 4. Mampu mengatasi isu/berita kampanye negatif (negative campaign ) dan isu/berita hoax terhadap para kontestan. 5. Terinternalisasi sikap anti money politics, kesediaan untuk turut mengawasi terselanggaranya Pemilu yang jurdil dan luber. Metode pendekatan berbasis partisipatif aktif dan interaktif dengan model ceramah, pelatihan, dan participatory learning/role playing disertai diskusi interaktif dan bedah kasus seperti kasus-kasus Hoax, money politics, dan negative campaign. Pola ini lebih menempatkan mitra sebagai mitra/partsipan aktif, dalam suasana kegiatan yang non formal/atraktif sehingga mampu menghasilkan serapan pengetahuan pendidikan politik yang mencedaskan. Terpenuhinya pemahaman dan perilaku pemilih pemula yang cerdas akan mendorong terwujudnya hasil Pemilu 2019 yang berkualitas dalam menghasilkan pemimpin dan para wakil rakyat yang amanah dan berjiwa negarawan. Kata Kunci: Pendidikan Politik, Pemilih Pemula, Cerdas Pemilu.

<p><em>This study aims to explain in detail why the dualism of local regulations testing after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution Research is also directed to provide a testing system solutions in the future regulation. Legal discourses are still academic debate is when the right of judicial review by the Supreme Court Regulation hostage by Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government. Supremacy of the constitution as part of the main characteristics of the legal state impressed distorted due to the duality of the regulation testing including how the implications of the Constitutional Court Number 137 PUU-XIII / 2015 Jo Court Number 56 / PUU-XIV / 2016 on June 14, 2017 last. Position regulation as executive versus legislative product as much a part of this study in order to find the ideal solution testing legislation in the future.The research method used was a normative legal research (legal research) which is based on the study of literature or secondary data divided form the primary legal materials, secondary law material and tertiary legal materials. Models used approach is the approach of law (statute aproach) and conceptual approach (conceptual aproach). A number of secondary data collected will be analyzed by descriptive qualitative where the process used deductive thinking. To get accuracy of understanding (subtilitas itellegendi) and accuracy translating (subtilitas explicandi) to solve the problem formulation.</em><strong></strong></p>

This study aims to explain in detail why the dualism of local regulations testing after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution Research is also directed to provide a testing system solutions in the future regulation. Legal discourses are still academic debate is when the right of judicial review by the Supreme Court Regulation hostage by Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government. Supremacy of the constitution as part of the main characteristics of the legal state impressed distorted due to the duality of the regulation testing including how the implications of the Constitutional Court Number 137 PUU-XIII / 2015 Jo Court Number 56 / PUU-XIV / 2016 on June 14, 2017 last. Position regulation as executive versus legislative product as much a part of this study in order to find the ideal solution testing legislation in the future.The research method used was a normative legal research (legal research) which is based on the study of literature or secondary data divided form the primary legal materials, secondary law material and tertiary legal materials. Models used approach is the approach of law (statute aproach) and conceptual approach (conceptual aproach). A number of secondary data collected will be analyzed by descriptive qualitative where the process used deductive thinking. To get accuracy of understanding (subtilitas itellegendi) and accuracy translating (subtilitas explicandi) to solve the problem formulation.