2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10963-018-9125-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polished Stone Axes in Caput Adriae from the Neolithic to the Copper Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probable origin of part of them from central Slovenia or even more distant regions would indicate that sometimes not only aesthetic and technological models but also the objects themselves moved from other regions to the Karst. The strong connections between central Slovenia and the Karst during the first half of the third millennium BC are confirmed by other classes of artefacts, such as copper and polished stone axes (Bernardini et al 2014a(Bernardini et al , 2014bBernardini 2018 and the references quoted there).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The probable origin of part of them from central Slovenia or even more distant regions would indicate that sometimes not only aesthetic and technological models but also the objects themselves moved from other regions to the Karst. The strong connections between central Slovenia and the Karst during the first half of the third millennium BC are confirmed by other classes of artefacts, such as copper and polished stone axes (Bernardini et al 2014a(Bernardini et al , 2014bBernardini 2018 and the references quoted there).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Initially, attention was given to shaft-hole axes due to lithological differences observed in artifacts from the Karst area and Friuli compared to Neolithic samples, suggesting changes in raw material provenance [20]. Subsequent studies extended to all types of polished stone axes, confirming previous hypotheses and identifying main raw material sources ( [14] and references therein) Later, on the basis of previous results, archaeometric analyses were applied to Neolithic, Copper, and Early Bronze Ages (hereafter EBA) pottery from Karst caves and Slovenian sites of the Ljubljansko barje [15][16][17][18], where axes and pots of peculiar forms had been found.…”
Section: Neolithicmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Besides C.R.I.G.A. and its evolution, other lines of research have significantly contributed to generating the present state of the art: in the Karst area in particular, sedimentological and soil micromorphological analyses of cave deposits, on the one hand [11][12][13], and archaeometric analyses of lithic and ceramic artifacts, on the other (for stone axes see: [14]; for pottery see: [15][16][17][18]).…”
Section: Neolithicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traces of earlier ephemeral occupation (i.e., Late Copper Age and Early Bronze Age) of the hilltops later occupied by fortified settlements have been recognized at several sites and mainly consist of pottery fragments and stone artefacts. At the settlement of Monkodonja, near Rovinj, some pottery finds ascribed to Cetina types (Hellmuth Kramberger, 2017) and a few polished stone shaft-hole axes (Bernardini, 2018;Zupanc ˇic ˇet al, 2012) indicate an ephemeral occupation of the hill during the Late Copper Age. Similar episodes of early occupations are, for example, documented in other hillforts in Istria (Mihovili c, 1997(Mihovili c, , 2001Sakara Suc ˇevi c, 2008), Karst (Guštin, 1979;Maselli Scotti, 1988;Montagnari Kokelj, 1989), and Friuli (Gerdol & Stacul, 1978;Visentini et al, 2014).…”
Section: Absolute Dating and Archaeological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%