1946
DOI: 10.2307/2785496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political and Occupational Cleavages in a Hanoverian Village, Germany: A Sociometric Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This homophily-based model is motivated by observations and theories of social networks (Blau, 1977;McPherson et al, 2001), where homophily is ubiquitous. Homophily was one of the first characteristics noted by early social network researchers (Almack, 1922;Bott, 1928;Richardson, 1940;Loomis, 1946;Lazarsfeld and Merton, 1954), and holds for a wide variety of different relationships (McPherson et al, 2001). It seems reasonable to conjecture that homophily may also be present in other sorts of networks, especially networks of artifacts created by people.…”
Section: Weighted-vote Relational Neighbor Classifier (Wvrn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This homophily-based model is motivated by observations and theories of social networks (Blau, 1977;McPherson et al, 2001), where homophily is ubiquitous. Homophily was one of the first characteristics noted by early social network researchers (Almack, 1922;Bott, 1928;Richardson, 1940;Loomis, 1946;Lazarsfeld and Merton, 1954), and holds for a wide variety of different relationships (McPherson et al, 2001). It seems reasonable to conjecture that homophily may also be present in other sorts of networks, especially networks of artifacts created by people.…”
Section: Weighted-vote Relational Neighbor Classifier (Wvrn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This favours the resolution of disruptive disagreements, the achievement of consensus, and it promotes a positive view of the group as a social unit [17]. Loomis’ classic study [18] reflects that homophily relates to psychological characteristics such as intelligence, attitudes, and aspirations. People who have homophilic relationships share common characteristics such as beliefs, values, education, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which makes communication and the creation of a relationship much easier. On the other hand, homophily also allows a person to know what attributes are seen as important within a group [18]. Similarities encourage people who are a part of a group in which friendship is formed, favouring the acceptance of pairs [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It refers to the frequent finding (Bott, 1928;Loomis, 1946) that agents in a network have a higher-than-random chance of being linked to someone similar to themselves (for a review see McPherson, Smith-Lovin and Cook, 2001). Homophily may be the result of either selection -we make friends with people like us -or adaptation, that is, once we are acquainted to someone, we tend to adapt his or her behavior, manners or opinions (see Baccara and Yariv, 2013, for a theoretical model).…”
Section: Homophily In Trustworthinessmentioning
confidence: 99%