2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political connections of newly privatized firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
363
0
23

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 559 publications
(437 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
31
363
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, privatized firms are expected to be independent from government control. In instances where government does not relinquish control, conflicting objectives may arise (Boubakri et al, 2008) and the resultant agency problem (Jensen & Meckling, 1976) is expected to impact firm performance. Privatized firms are perhaps attractive to CPA researchers because of the likelihood that they would still be connected to government.…”
Section: Emerging Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Typically, privatized firms are expected to be independent from government control. In instances where government does not relinquish control, conflicting objectives may arise (Boubakri et al, 2008) and the resultant agency problem (Jensen & Meckling, 1976) is expected to impact firm performance. Privatized firms are perhaps attractive to CPA researchers because of the likelihood that they would still be connected to government.…”
Section: Emerging Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Hadani and Schuler (2013) reported evidence to suggest that CPA has a negative impact on market value. Politically connected firms record poor accounting performance after privatization (Boubakri et al, 2008) and after initial public offerings (Fan et al, 2007). Connected firms also have poor accruals quality (Chaney et al, 2011) and are charged higher interest rates on loans (Bliss & Gul, 2012).…”
Section: Negative Performance Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We examine several sets of regulation, exchange rule, and governance variables. (Cumming and Johan, 2008;Cumming, Johan and Li, 2011 (Erb et al, 1996;Gradstein, 2007;Boubakri et al, 2008). A higher score indicates a less risky country.…”
Section: Key Independent Variables: the Regulation Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%