The Evolution of Water Resource Planning and Decision Making 2009
DOI: 10.4337/9781848449367.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Decision Making: Real Decisions in Real Political Contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a common criticism of optimization is that the “best” optimal solution is determined by an analytical structure that may not fully capture the complexity of the actual problem under investigation. Second, optimization models can be particularly compatible with problems dominated by economic objectives and the assumptions of rational choice theory [ Hisschemöller et al ., ; Rogers et al ., ]. The authors, hence, adapted the optimization model to prioritize and aggregate options but integrated the modeling process with cognitive mapping to engage stakeholders early on during the problem‐structuring phase, and elicited from the participants' assessment qualitative and semiquantitative indicators.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a common criticism of optimization is that the “best” optimal solution is determined by an analytical structure that may not fully capture the complexity of the actual problem under investigation. Second, optimization models can be particularly compatible with problems dominated by economic objectives and the assumptions of rational choice theory [ Hisschemöller et al ., ; Rogers et al ., ]. The authors, hence, adapted the optimization model to prioritize and aggregate options but integrated the modeling process with cognitive mapping to engage stakeholders early on during the problem‐structuring phase, and elicited from the participants' assessment qualitative and semiquantitative indicators.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition is situated within the broader environmental governance definition, which looks at the formal and informal rules and practices guiding actors' use of social-ecological systems Pahl-Wostl, 2009). The governance of water resources and other social-ecological systems is based upon theories of collective action (Rogers, MacDonnell, & Lydon, 2009). Water, as a "fugitive resource"-its supply engenders natural monopolies and its use also generates to externalities (Rogers et al, 2009, p. 225)-requires institutions capable of 1) minimizing transaction costs among actors, and 2) effective monitoring and enforcement of common rules to punish defectors and free-riders (Schneider et al, 2003).…”
Section: Figure 21: Urban Watersheds In the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, the above institutional prescriptions are generally in response to the limits of the economic theory of politics (Rogers et al, 2009). The economic theory of politics was first critiqued by Downs (1957), which later became the bedrock in developing what became known as the 'rational choice' or 'public choice' governance model (see Brennan & Buchanan, 1984;Keating, 1995).…”
Section: Figure 21: Urban Watersheds In the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%