Political dejection in a divided society: a challenge for Latvia’s democracy?

Abstract

Ethnically divided societies often seek political cohesion by pursuing nationalizing policies. Latvia has had some experience of this, for example, with the notion that citizens should speak the national language and respect government institutions coincides with portrayals of ethnic minorities as a challenge to democracy. The focus on nation-state building has resulted in persistently low levels of political engagement and public confidence among the citizenry. Public survey data shows that many voters believe their concerns have been neglected by elected representatives, who have fixed their attention on ethnopolitical issues. While we see no demonstrable correlation between ethnicity and levels of political dejection, ethnonational politics explains unstable voter-representative relations and electoral volatility during the Saeima elections from 2010-2018. These unanticipated effects of nation-state building on Latvia's electoral politics invite a rethinking of the relationship between voters and their elected representatives in democratically consolidated, yet divided nations.

Cross-segmental parties in consociational systems: Downplaying prowess to access power in Northern Ireland

“…This does not neglect the (potential) changes in a society’s politically salient identities, but primarily affects the dynamics of party-based representation of divided communities (Cox, 1999). At a minimum, a party’s continuous electoral success discourages political moderation (Fraenkel and Grofman, 2006) and, at most, encourages citizen disengagement from politics (Hayward and McManus, 2019), as well as the erosion of trust in (consociational) democracy at large (Agarin and Nakai, 2021). On the other hand, political parties that seek to appeal across the politically relevant divide and engage socially salient identities, rather than ones that are relevant due to the political system, face two hurdles.…”

Microfoundations of Threat and Security Perceptions in Ethnically Diverse States: Lessons from Russia’s “Near Abroad”

“…There are significant differences between Latvians and Russian speakers in terms of evaluation of Latvia's membership in the EU and NATO, with Russian speakers being less supportive of Latvia's membership in these two organizations (Berzina et al 2016). At the same time, a notable convergence about the effectiveness of the state has occurred in opinions of titular and nontitular Latvian residents (Agarin and Nakai 2021).…”