2006
DOI: 10.1080/16522729.2006.11803914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Governing and Curriculum Change – From Active to Reactive Curriculum Reforms The need for a reorientation of Curriculum Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These developments can be seen as a response to a globalised world and an economy where production has changed, with new technologies and a society marked by heterogeneity in cultures and beliefs (Lundgren, 2006). In today's knowledge society, traditional ideological and centralised steering of education is challenged by rapid changes in information and knowledge (Aasen, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These developments can be seen as a response to a globalised world and an economy where production has changed, with new technologies and a society marked by heterogeneity in cultures and beliefs (Lundgren, 2006). In today's knowledge society, traditional ideological and centralised steering of education is challenged by rapid changes in information and knowledge (Aasen, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Lundgren (2006), these developments lead to changes in power structures that influence how education is governed. Grounded in an understanding of the curriculum as '.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it can be argued that manifestations of decentralization and agency differ between the Scandinavian countries and countries in Northern Europe and the USA (Møller & Skedsmo, 2013;Gunter et al, 2016;Prøitz & Aasen, 2017), and traditions for assessment and grading even vary considerably across the Scandinavian countries (Lundahl, Hulten, & Tveit, 2017). Variations in curriculum development between countries have been described as reflecting long-standing traditions in approaches to schooling in terms of curriculum versus didaktik (Hopmann, 2015;Lundgren, 2006;Karseth & Sivesind, 2010). Moreover, what is considered as evidence in education has been observed as differing between contexts, regions and countries (Gough, Tripney, Kenny, & Buk-Berge, 2011;Rieper & Hansen, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the new frameworks for national testing, the content of schooling is redefined in terms of competence aims, detailing levels of achievement in certain areas. These evaluations partly contest the formal curriculum and become reactive to what is considered as the main purposes and aims of schooling (Lundgren, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%