Political Leadership and Global Governance: Structural Power Versus Custodial Leadership

Morton, Katherine

doi:10.1007/s41111-017-0089-4

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In general, according to Morton (2017), it can be understood that leadership is crucial, mostly during international crises, strategic vulnerabilities, or even the conditions of instability. However, the specific political leadership structure needed to consolidate cooperative movements during the shift is still not sufficiently comprehended.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fractured Global Health Governance

Pramudia

2022

NSJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper discusses the increasing role of China and its rivalry with the United States in global health governance. COVID-19 has presented new challenges in the domain of global health, marked by the debate between unilateral and multilateral approaches to dealing with the pandemic. US declining role poses a threat to the spirit of multilateralism and the prospects for global health governance. When global health governance is on the brink of collapse, China upholds a multilateral approach to lead collective action to defeat the virus. This research utilizes qualitative research method and literature study to collect research data sourced from secondary data sources. Using the concept of rising powers in the realm of global health governance, the results of this study show that the pandemic has offered China a strategic opportunity to fill a leadership vacuum. It has also improved its global position by providing the world with much-needed information and medical supplies. The active contribution of China to global health governance may enhance its global image and legitimacy, build relationships and friendships, emphasize the Peaceful Rise narrative, and support the Health Silk Road project.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fractured Global Health Governance

Pramudia

2022

NSJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section Introduction: Why We Need More Effective Leadership at the Global Level

Seaman

Mahmoudi

2022

Fundamental Challenges to Global Peace and Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exploring the Nexus and Utilities Between Regional and Global Ocean Governance Architecture

Adewumi

2021

Front. Mar. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regional and global ocean governance share complex, co-evolutionary histories in which both regimes – among others – interacted with and used the ocean and resources therein to consolidate, expand, and express power. Simultaneously, regional and global ocean governance relations have changed continuously, particularly when we are trying to understand their differences within the logic of regionalisation, regionalism, and globalisation. The paper is generally based on deductive reasoning and reflects scholarship in security studies, political science, international law, international relation, development studies, and African studies. It delves into the critical aspect of understanding the nexus/relationship between regional and global ocean governance in critical traditional and contemporary ocean policy domains, specifically from an African regional ocean governance standpoint. Ocean governance processes that are historically confronted by globalisation, multilateralism, and post-colonisation are confronted by the rise of regionalism, especially the need for nation-states and regions to respond to and manage traditional and emerging ocean challenges. Responses to these challenges by various actors, including states, economic blocks, private sector, financial institutions, and non-governmental organisations, development partners, etc., result in different forms of relationships that refocus regions’ activities toward globally defined ocean agendas. A review of different policy domains (including maritime security, environmental, economic, and socio-political governance) critical for regional ocean governance sets a robust background for understanding the contextual factors and concerns inherent in the regional-global ocean governance nexus. These outcomes, therefore, help us to arrive at a five-fold taxonomy of different types/degrees of linkages developed around the regional-global ocean governance relationship spectrum described as (1) discrete, (2) conflictual, (3) cooperative, (4) symmetric, and (5) ambiguous. Comparatively, experience and perspective from Africa are utilised to support raised arguments about these linkages. Furthermore, this spectrum allows for the diagnosis of the utilities and most prevalent arguments that regional governance’s effectiveness is directly related to the nature of the interaction between regional governance schemes and global governance; and vice-versa. This paper’s outcomes reveal how government, institutions, actors, and researchers address the relationship between regional and global ocean governance and generate a valuable way to think about current and future global and regional ocean governance direction while outlining some logical possibilities for an effective form of ocean governance.

show abstract

Political Leadership and Global Governance: Structural Power Versus Custodial Leadership

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

Fractured Global Health Governance

Fractured Global Health Governance

Section Introduction: Why We Need More Effective Leadership at the Global Level

Exploring the Nexus and Utilities Between Regional and Global Ocean Governance Architecture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About