2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9558.00151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Modernities: Disentangling Two Underlying Dimensions of Institutional Differentiation

Abstract: This article recommends that we recover two old contrasts from the history of social thought in order to facilitate the recently renewed discussion of multiple variants of European political modernity. Recovering them greatly aids in clarifying the different "modernizing" paths that the European-system polities took during the stateconsolidation and nation-building periods of the "long nineteenth century." Specifically, the basic polity forms delineated in this article capture strikingly well the distinctive "… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
112
2
9

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
112
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the most visible of such institutions is the varieties of corporatism across countries. We construe corporatism as "located in the realm of institutional behavior" (Schmitter 1981: 295)-an exploration of how society is organized to achieve its economic goals rather than as a political ideology (Cawson 1986, Hicks and Kenworthy 1998, Jepperson 2002. In this vein, the organization of society is characterized as either more corporatist-a society of orders with a set of rights and obligations, or less corporatist (pluralist)-a society of individuals bound in loose association (e.g.…”
Section: Corporatist and Pluralist Institutional Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Among the most visible of such institutions is the varieties of corporatism across countries. We construe corporatism as "located in the realm of institutional behavior" (Schmitter 1981: 295)-an exploration of how society is organized to achieve its economic goals rather than as a political ideology (Cawson 1986, Hicks and Kenworthy 1998, Jepperson 2002. In this vein, the organization of society is characterized as either more corporatist-a society of orders with a set of rights and obligations, or less corporatist (pluralist)-a society of individuals bound in loose association (e.g.…”
Section: Corporatist and Pluralist Institutional Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, the organization of society is characterized as either more corporatist-a society of orders with a set of rights and obligations, or less corporatist (pluralist)-a society of individuals bound in loose association (e.g. Jepperson andMeyer 1991, Jepperson 2002). …”
Section: Corporatist and Pluralist Institutional Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Não seria surpreendente, portanto, se muitos dos fenômenos que associamos à modernidade (ou à modernização) se manifestassem lá depois -e, de fato, há sinais de que é precisamente isso o que está acontecendo (cf., p. ex., JEPPERSON, 2002) 22 .…”
Section: Variedades Da Modernidadeunclassified