2016
DOI: 10.1177/0090591716659812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Theory and the Politics of Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I situate this article within the emerging subfield of CPT, which has sought to “deparochialise” political thought within the globally privileged Western canon, by including thinkers, positions, methods, and knowledges from “non-Western” places and cultures, or from marginalised perspectives within the Western tradition. 1 Discussion among CPT scholars is often characterised by hyper-reflexivity, and most of the terms used in the previous sentence (Western, non-Western, tradition, culture) are the subject of active critique and debate, as participants seek to avoid generalising, essentialising, and reifying, even while recognising and contesting the power dynamics that continue to govern the practice and teaching of political theory in academic institutions, dynamics that privilege the thought and views of predominantly white, male, heterosexual individuals from Europe or North America (Godrej, 2009; Idris, 2016; Williams and Warren, 2014).…”
Section: Methods and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I situate this article within the emerging subfield of CPT, which has sought to “deparochialise” political thought within the globally privileged Western canon, by including thinkers, positions, methods, and knowledges from “non-Western” places and cultures, or from marginalised perspectives within the Western tradition. 1 Discussion among CPT scholars is often characterised by hyper-reflexivity, and most of the terms used in the previous sentence (Western, non-Western, tradition, culture) are the subject of active critique and debate, as participants seek to avoid generalising, essentialising, and reifying, even while recognising and contesting the power dynamics that continue to govern the practice and teaching of political theory in academic institutions, dynamics that privilege the thought and views of predominantly white, male, heterosexual individuals from Europe or North America (Godrej, 2009; Idris, 2016; Williams and Warren, 2014).…”
Section: Methods and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors have argued, for example, whether the NI power-sharing arrangements, policing reform, or inclusive negotiations rules should be “exported” to places such as Iraq or the Basque Country (Dixon, 2015; Ellison, 2007; McGarry and O’leary, 2006; O’Kane, 2010). In this article, however, I eschew such debates and instead adopt the research approach of the “politics of comparison” (Idris, 2016; Stoler, 2001). This approach treats comparison not as a methodological tool but as the object of inquiry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…160 Forrester offers an archivally informed explanation for Rawls's seeming early disinterest in Keynes, arguing that the early Rawls was to the right of Keynes and that it was only by the late 1950s that he had moved his views in line with what were then Keynesian commonplaces. 161 Drawing on both Rawls's and Buchanan's archives, extension when they were about to be eroded by a neoliberal revolution." 171 With TJ, Rawls made a monument to a world that, if ever really in reach, was swiftly slipping from view.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%