Political Values, Culture, and Corporate Litigation

Abstract

Using one of the largest samples of litigation data available to date, we examine whether the political culture of a firm determines its propensity for corporate misconduct. We measure political culture using the political contributions of top managers, firm political action committees, and local residents. We show that firms with a Republican culture are more likely to be the subject of civil rights, labor, and environmental litigation than are Democratic firms, consistent with the Democratic ideology that emphasizes equal rights, labor rights, and environmental protection. However, firms with a Democratic culture are more likely to be the subject of litigation related to securities fraud and intellectual property rights violations than are Republican firms, whose party ideology stresses self-reliance, property rights, market discipline, and limited government regulation. Upon litigation filing, both types of firms experience similar announcement reaction, which suggests that the observed relationship between political culture and corporate misconduct is unlikely to reflect differences in expected litigation costs. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2106 . This paper was accepted by Brad Barber, finance.

Does a CEO’s Cultural Heritage Affect Performance under Competitive Pressure?

“…This is in line withHutton, Jiang, and Kumar (2015), who find that different cultures have different value implications depending on the specific contexts.4 We construct several validation tests to ensure that the IBBEA shock is indeed unforeseen by banks and CEOs. For instance, we employ the methodology ofBertrand and Mullainathan (2003) and confirm there are no prior trends in bank profitability or risk-taking surrounding the period of deregulation.…”

The effects of media slant on firm behavior

“…7 However, we expect the effect to be strongest for Democratic firms located in areas with FNC availability. Prior research finds that local stakeholders have a greater ability to influence firm behavior and, as a result, firms pay particularly close attention to developments in their local information environment (Ayers, Ramalingegowda, and Yeung 2011;Chhaochharia, Kumar, and Niessen-Ruenzi, 2012;Hutton, Jiang, and Kumar, 2015). These studies maintain that because local stakeholders encounter lower costs in communicating with managers, firms are particularly responsive to the needs of stakeholders in their local environment.…”

Local religious beliefs and municipal bond market outcomes

“…Evidence indicates that, on average, Republicans are likely to be more conservative than Democrats. Indeed, prior work shows that Republicans are significantly more risk averse than Democrats and that Conservatives have traits that serve as important determinants of various economic and financial decisions (see, e.g., Hutton et al., ; Kam & Simas, ). It is reasonable to argue that local religious beliefs might be displaying the effect originating from Republican ideology in the county of bond issuers.…”

“…As the political structure influences municipal bond yields, I control for this and continue to find significant results for the effect of local religious beliefs on local government bond outcomes. There is evidence that Republicans who are conservatives have traits that serve as important determinants of various economic and financial decisions (e.g., Hutton, Jiang, & Kumar, ). Republicans tend to be more risk averse in their economic and financial decision making.…”