1982
DOI: 10.1086/292404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politics as Rhetoric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of symbolic rhetoric from an anthropological perspective can be traced to the works of Bloch (1975) and includes the work of Herzfeld (1987), Borgstrom (1982), Van Luong (1988), Cohen (1979), and McLeod (1990a). The power of political rhetoric has been demonstrated by Bailey (1981), Marlin (1988), Bennett (1980), Burke (1982), Grillo (1989), Lakoff (1990), Kertzer (1987), McLeod and Abe (1995), and a host of others. Kertzer (1987:101) has noted the significant relationship between rhetoric and ritual in the process of power acquisition and legitimation:…”
Section: Overview: Presidential Elections Sociodramas and Rituals Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of symbolic rhetoric from an anthropological perspective can be traced to the works of Bloch (1975) and includes the work of Herzfeld (1987), Borgstrom (1982), Van Luong (1988), Cohen (1979), and McLeod (1990a). The power of political rhetoric has been demonstrated by Bailey (1981), Marlin (1988), Bennett (1980), Burke (1982), Grillo (1989), Lakoff (1990), Kertzer (1987), McLeod and Abe (1995), and a host of others. Kertzer (1987:101) has noted the significant relationship between rhetoric and ritual in the process of power acquisition and legitimation:…”
Section: Overview: Presidential Elections Sociodramas and Rituals Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Bormann (1972) proposed formation of rhetorical vision, rhetorical strategies often used in the language for persuasion has been developed by rhetorical scholars based on Aristotle's persuasion strategies (Burke 1969(Burke , 1982Self 1979;Braet 1992;Garver 1994;Abizadeh 2002;Robinson 2006). Aristotle (1991) proposes three possible methods for constructing a persuasive claim: logos (logical study), ethos (sociology study), and pathos (psychological study) -are derived from the three factors that are apparent in any of the speech: (a) presenting the view that the speaker is a 'trustworthy' character; (b) creating a logical argument or reasoning through the text; and (c) putting the audience in a certain frame and enables the speaker, text, or a combination of the two to arouse the audience's emotions (Burke 1969(Burke , 1982Self 1979;Braet 1992;Garver 1994;Abizadeh 2002;Robinson 2006). In other words, logos, pathos, and ethos provide evidences on rhetorical strategies through reflecting on argument implicit in a communication (Burke 1982;Self 1979;Abizadeh 2002;Robinson 2006;Higgins and Robyn 2012;Devin and Lane 2014).…”
Section: Aristotle's Persuasion and Rhetorical Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liberals must appeal to the conven tional majority without suggesting an un principled cynicism that could undermine their main base of active support. These problems of political communication are moderated to some extent by evidence [Kohlberg, 1971;Rest, 1979] that people may have an intuitive preference for some what higher-stage claims than those they can justify; and, contrary to Burke [1982], their solution will not include a tendency for political rhetoric 'to fall to the lowest common denominator of the community'. Rather, political utterances and manifestos need to include a rich concoction of claims crafted so as to appeal from both lower and higher perspectives.…”
Section: I'he Moral Dimension Of Political Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%