2016
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.24.2176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Politics of policy: Assessing the implementation, impact, and evolution of the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT) and edTPA

Abstract: Summative performance assessments in teacher education, such as the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT) and the edTPA, have been heralded through polices intended to enhance the quality of the teaching profession and raise its stature among other professions. However, the development and implementation of the PACT, and subsequently the edTPA, have not been without controversy and Políticas de la política: La evaluación de la aplicación, impacto y evolución de la Evaluación de Desempeño de Mae… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is little ambiguity in the adopted policy: edTPA national cut scores were adopted with no phase-in period, mastery levels were identified to be reported publicly by institution, and, after just one year of field testing, the policy was implemented for all initial certification candidates. In contrast to other states with consequential policies but four years of field testing (Reagan, Schram, McCurdy, Chang, & Evans, 2016), New York's rapid implementation led to a series of subsequent regulations to establish a "safety net" for those who failed the edTPA, allowing candidates to take the previous standardized certification exam of pedagogical knowledge for up to four years after initial implementation. Although national edTPA results in 2015 show a pass rate of 71%, the national reporting is unreliable given that states set different cut scores (SCALE, 2016).…”
Section: Edtpa Implementation In New Yorkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is little ambiguity in the adopted policy: edTPA national cut scores were adopted with no phase-in period, mastery levels were identified to be reported publicly by institution, and, after just one year of field testing, the policy was implemented for all initial certification candidates. In contrast to other states with consequential policies but four years of field testing (Reagan, Schram, McCurdy, Chang, & Evans, 2016), New York's rapid implementation led to a series of subsequent regulations to establish a "safety net" for those who failed the edTPA, allowing candidates to take the previous standardized certification exam of pedagogical knowledge for up to four years after initial implementation. Although national edTPA results in 2015 show a pass rate of 71%, the national reporting is unreliable given that states set different cut scores (SCALE, 2016).…”
Section: Edtpa Implementation In New Yorkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While New York's implementation has been regularly critiqued (Cochran-Smith et al, 2016;Reagan et al, 2016), it remains an important case for examining how the edTPA acts as an individual licensure exam. That distinction has real consequences for the profession, programs, and, particularly for those learning to teach.…”
Section: Edtpa Implementation In New Yorkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, over the past two decades, major policy proposals for reforming teacher education have been proposed, piloted, and implemented at the local, state, and national levels. The proposed policies have enhanced accountability for teachers and improved the standards of teachers' performance [47]. In particular, a performance-based assessment of pre-service teachers is considered to be one of the policies clearly aimed at improving the quality of teaching and the advancement of other professional staffs in education [47].…”
Section: Pre-service Teacher Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, since the assessment is administered by a private, for-profit company, there are concerns about the commercialization and marketing strategies being used to pressure states and programs to adopt the assessment (Au, 2013). As noted by Reagan, Schram, McCurdy, Chang, and Evans (2016), "the edTPA's inclusion of multiple actors outside of the profession raises questions about the extent to which the assessment is still close to the spirit of an 'assessment for educators, by educators'" (p. 17). Given the impact that these accountability initiatives will have on the field, it is important that teacher educators have a voice in the policymaking process.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%