2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-009-0262-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen morphology and its phylogenetic significance in tribe Sanguisorbeae (Rosaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
24
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In Boragineae, most of these transitions are in single species, but in Lithospermeae, shifts in pollen pore number tend to characterize larger clades. In general, pollen pore number in Boraginaceae has increased from three pores to six or greater, a trend observed in other groups as well, such as Cuscuta L. (Welsh et al., ), Dioscorea L. (Schols et al., ), and Sanguisorbeae (Chung et al., ). Dajoz et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In Boragineae, most of these transitions are in single species, but in Lithospermeae, shifts in pollen pore number tend to characterize larger clades. In general, pollen pore number in Boraginaceae has increased from three pores to six or greater, a trend observed in other groups as well, such as Cuscuta L. (Welsh et al., ), Dioscorea L. (Schols et al., ), and Sanguisorbeae (Chung et al., ). Dajoz et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Taxonomists and botanists have recognized the importance of pollen morphology in clarifying the classification of many plants: in particular Hebda et al [10] showed that exine sculpturing, aperture and aperture zone structure, grain shape and grain size are all useful features to distinguish genera and even species of rosaceous pollen; Fogle [5,6] demonstrated species-specific variation in pollen size and in exine sculpturing among the fruit-crop of the genera Malus Mill., Prunus L. (peaches and cherries), and Pyrus L. [14]; Moore et al [15] have emphasized a very large differentiation of pollen morphology of the taxa of Rosaceae family, even among the populations within the same species. They thought the pollen size to be the least reliable feature and they related it to the comparatively frequent occurrence of hybrid and polyploid species in this family.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic pollen morphology of all three rosaceous subfamilies (see Potter et al 2007) and many genera/species of the tribes and subtribes within Rosaceae have been studied to some extent. Pollen types of the subfamily Rosoideae have been studied using mostly LM and SEM by Huang (1972), Hebda et al (1988aHebda et al ( , 1988b, Hebda and Chinnappa (1990), Jones et al (1995), Wang et al (1995), Beug (2004), Tahir (2005), Fujiki and Ozawa (2007), Chung et al (2010), Li et al (2011a), Miyoshi et al (2011), Wrońska-Pilarek (2011), Wrońska-Pilarek and Jagodziński (2011), Wrońska-Pilarek et al (2012, Perveen and Qaiser (2014) and Faghir et al (2015). The subfamily Dryadoideae has been studied by Hebda et al (1988b) and Beug (2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%