2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00243.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollutant dispersion in a large indoor space. Part 2: Computational fluid dynamics predictions and comparison with a scale model experiment for isothermal flow

Abstract: CFD modeling of pollutant transport is becoming increasingly common but high quality comparisons between CFD and experiment remain rare. Our results provide such a comparison. We demonstrate that the standard k-epsilon model provides good predictions for both transient and fully developed pollutant concentrations for an isothermal large space where furnishings are unimportant. This model is less computationally intensive than a large eddy simulation or low Reynolds number k-epsilon model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to transient nature of contaminant dispersion and low resolution in the experiment, it is difficult to compare CFD predictions with experimental measurements. Only recently there have been studies for isothermal flow conditions where small scale experimental models with high spatial and temporal resolution concentration maps have been validated with CFD predictions 31 . Initial studies demonstrate that Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence model provides good predictions for both transient and steady state pollutant concentrations for isothermal flows.…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to transient nature of contaminant dispersion and low resolution in the experiment, it is difficult to compare CFD predictions with experimental measurements. Only recently there have been studies for isothermal flow conditions where small scale experimental models with high spatial and temporal resolution concentration maps have been validated with CFD predictions 31 . Initial studies demonstrate that Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence model provides good predictions for both transient and steady state pollutant concentrations for isothermal flows.…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a minimum Reynolds number is usually prescribed for model tests. Model Reynolds numbers in excess of the critical Reynolds number are preferable, as the range of turbulent length scales (the turbulence cascade) increases with increasing Reynolds number (Finlayson et al, 2004).…”
Section: Reynolds Number Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CFD models can provide detailed within-room profiles of velocities and contaminant concentrations (Fan, 1995;Nielsen, 2004). Such information can be useful in large spaces where the well-mixed assumption and uniform temperature profiles are commonly inappropriate (Finlayson et al, 2004;Gan and Riffat, 2004;Jayaraman et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2001).…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%