The combination of proton exchange membrane (PEM) and anion exchange membrane (AEM) materials to form a bipolar membrane (BPM) is of interest in hybrid electrochemical devices to mitigate the disadvantages of their monopolar counterparts. The PEM-AEM interface is a critical component in bipolar membrane fuel cell operation. In this study, mono-and di-membrane bipolar membranes were fabricated. Interfacial materials with varying conductivities were used in order to control the location of the junction within the di-membrane BPMs. Mono-membrane BPMs were constructed via conversion of a single face of a monopolar membrane (Nafion). The membranes were used in fully functional fuel cells and characterized via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). For the di-membrane BPMs, use of a conductive interface consisting of a single ion conductive material resulted in devices with lower interfacial resistance as compared to a neutral interface. When comparing conductive interface materials, anion-conductive materials provided lower total membrane resistance than proton-conductive materials. This decrease is due to positioning the junction closer to the anode and farther from the air-cathode. These results show that the formation of the optimal junction is critically dependent on fabrication technique and location. Polymeric membrane-based fuel cells are a promising candidate to provide clean, efficient, and energy dense power sources. Of the primary types of these fuel cells, proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells have capabilities of producing extremely high power densities, and the materials used as the proton exchange membrane (e.g. Nafion) are thermally and mechanically robust, allowing for long-term operation. Despite these features, there are several drawbacks relating to the operation of these devices under acidic conditions. First, the migration of protons from anode to cathode results in electro-osmotic drag of water (and methanol, where applicable) which can lead to a phenomenon known as "cathode flooding" or a blockage of transport passageways with water. Second, both the catalytic and polymeric materials required to survive the harsh acidic operating environment are expensive to manufacture. Third, both the metal catalyst and its carbon support are subject to corrosion at low pH.One alternative to the PEM fuel cell is the anion exchange membrane (AEM) fuel cell. This configuration addresses many of the shortcomings of the PEM cell simply by operating under alkaline (high pH) conditions. AEM fuel cells potentially address many of the issues inherent with PEM devices. The basic operating environment is much more conducive to the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), which opens the possibility of using non-platinum based (cheaper) catalysts.1-3 Additionally, anion exchange membranes are typically hydrocarbon based, and as such are less expensive to manufacture than Nafion and other perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) membranes used in PEM devices. Another benefit is the reversed direction of ion transport through th...