1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4238(99)00055-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyamines in buds of apple as affected by temperature and their relationship to bud development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown that spermidine concentration was significantly decreased at 38 °C compared with 30 °C in both years of the study, while spermine was also significantly decreased in 2007 and numerically lower in 2008. Similar findings have been reported in apple ( Malus domestica L.) where an increase in temperature 6–7 weeks after flowering reduced the content of spermidine and putrescine, but not spermine (Zhu et al. 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It was shown that spermidine concentration was significantly decreased at 38 °C compared with 30 °C in both years of the study, while spermine was also significantly decreased in 2007 and numerically lower in 2008. Similar findings have been reported in apple ( Malus domestica L.) where an increase in temperature 6–7 weeks after flowering reduced the content of spermidine and putrescine, but not spermine (Zhu et al. 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Caffaro et al 11 proposed that polyamines might be part of a complex mechanism involved in flowering signal. An intimate connection between polyamines and floral development makes it possible to establish some physiological or biochemical markers using the individual polyamine, the ratios or the total polyamines 69,94 . High levels of Spd and Spm and low Put are associated with flowering of hazelnut trees, whereas the reverse trend is related to dormancy initiation 68 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long‐chain PAs (Spd and Spm) were dominant in all the periods studied. The literature has reported increases in Spd and Spm associated with flower development, and Spd was defined as a marker of floral induction (Applewhite et al 2000, Huang et al 2004, Kakkar and Rai 1993, Tiburcio et al 1993), while Spm was directly linked to the last stages of flower development, as well as to the increase of temperature required for floral expression (Zhu et al 1999). On the contrary, Put was found to be less important and its content decreased during floral bud development from September to February.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%