2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-003-0712-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyandry and fecundity in the Lepidoptera: can methodological and conceptual approaches bias outcomes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
56
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although sugar-fed mated females produced slightly less pheromone than either sugaror water-fed virgins, the high level of polyandry observed in H. virescens (Lamunyon, 2000;Raulston et al, 1975) suggests that virgins are readily mated and that competition for additional mates among mated females may be important. Therefore, sugar feeding by mated females of polyandrous moth species may be important for increasing fecundity directly (Ramaswamy et al, 1997), as well as indirectly, by increasing the likelihood of further matings, which in turn causes increased fecundity (Torres-Vila et al, 2004). Such enhanced effects on fecundity should be accounted for in studies on female fitness and benefits of nectar feeding by night-flying pollinating moths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sugar-fed mated females produced slightly less pheromone than either sugaror water-fed virgins, the high level of polyandry observed in H. virescens (Lamunyon, 2000;Raulston et al, 1975) suggests that virgins are readily mated and that competition for additional mates among mated females may be important. Therefore, sugar feeding by mated females of polyandrous moth species may be important for increasing fecundity directly (Ramaswamy et al, 1997), as well as indirectly, by increasing the likelihood of further matings, which in turn causes increased fecundity (Torres-Vila et al, 2004). Such enhanced effects on fecundity should be accounted for in studies on female fitness and benefits of nectar feeding by night-flying pollinating moths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gwynne et al , 1984;Jones et al , 1986;Svärd & Wiklund, 1988;Wedell & Arak, 1989;Will & Sakaluk, 1994;Ward & Landolt, 1995;Vahed & Gilbert, 1997;Cook, 1999;Maxwell, 2000;Ryne et al , 2001;Vahed, 2003 ; see also Torres-Vila et al , 2004 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These positive effects include compensation for mating with a genetically incompatible, inferior, or infertile male and an increase in genetic variability among the offspring ( [16,17], and references therein). Moreover, substances in the male ejaculate (nuptial gifts) can increase female lifespan [18,19], female fecundity (see [20] for an overview), and offspring fitness [21,22]. Positive effects of the ejaculate act either directly, by providing extra resources for somatic maintenance of females ( [18] and references therein [19,23]), or indirectly, by protecting the female against predators (e.g., the pyrrolizidine alkaloids transferred by male Utetheisa ornatrix [24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%