2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polydopamine Biomaterials for Skin Regeneration

Abstract: Designing biomaterials capable of biomimicking wound healing and skin regeneration has been receiving increasing attention recently. Some biopolymers behave similarly to the extracellular matrix (ECM), supporting biointerfacial adhesion and intrinsic cellular interactions. Polydopamine (PDA) is a natural bioadhesive and bioactive polymer that endows high chemical versatility, making it an exciting candidate for a wide range of biomedical applications. Moreover, biomaterials based on PDA and its derivatives hav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the pros of PDA outweigh its cons, various groups of scientists have modified the biomaterials’ surfaces by employing PDA with the aim of augmenting their surface performance. Therefore, within the last couple of years, PDA has been in the spotlight, with diverse applications in the field of biomedical engineering ( Lynge et al, 2011 ), including drug delivery ( Huang et al, 2018 ), implants ( Jia et al, 2019 ), surface engineering ( Yang et al, 2015 ), cancer therapy ( Abdollahi et al, 2022 ; Honmane et al, 2022 ), TE (bone ( Huang et al, 2016 ; Kaushik et al, 2020 ), cartilage ( Huang et al, 2021 ), muscle ( Zhou et al, 2021 ), skin ( Yazdi et al, 2022 ), tendon ( Lin et al, 2019 ), and neuron ( Qian et al, 2018 ; Yan et al, 2020 )), and microfluidic systems ( Niculescu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pros of PDA outweigh its cons, various groups of scientists have modified the biomaterials’ surfaces by employing PDA with the aim of augmenting their surface performance. Therefore, within the last couple of years, PDA has been in the spotlight, with diverse applications in the field of biomedical engineering ( Lynge et al, 2011 ), including drug delivery ( Huang et al, 2018 ), implants ( Jia et al, 2019 ), surface engineering ( Yang et al, 2015 ), cancer therapy ( Abdollahi et al, 2022 ; Honmane et al, 2022 ), TE (bone ( Huang et al, 2016 ; Kaushik et al, 2020 ), cartilage ( Huang et al, 2021 ), muscle ( Zhou et al, 2021 ), skin ( Yazdi et al, 2022 ), tendon ( Lin et al, 2019 ), and neuron ( Qian et al, 2018 ; Yan et al, 2020 )), and microfluidic systems ( Niculescu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine mussels are famous for their superior ability for adhering to the surface of nanomaterials. [20][21][22] The strong adhesive Interface force could be attributed to mussel adhesive proteins. Inspired by this, a novel surface modification strategy had been developed by Lee et al 23 in 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine mussels are famous for their superior ability for adhering to the surface of nanomaterials 20–22 . The strong adhesive Interface force could be attributed to mussel adhesive proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the development of protein molecular imprinting technology still confronts many challenges, mainly because of the intrinsic properties of proteins, such as the large size, structural variability, complex surface groups and easy denaturation and unfolding during the separation process [ 14 , 15 ]. To solve these problems, the molecularly imprinted hydrogel is a good choice, because the biocompatibility of the hydrogel-based system does not affect protein conformation and the macroporous structure of hydrogel can act as the passages of the proteins [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. What is especially worth noting is that supermacropores can be formed in cryogels during frozen polymerization, which can allow a rapider and non-restricted mass-transport of proteins than common hydrogels [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor mechanical stability will limit the separation efficiency and the reusability of MIP. To enhance the mechanical strength, adding another component has been attempted [ 16 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ], because the good mechanical property of the composite constructs can maintain the shape of the imprinted cavities to improve the regeneration properties of the hydrogels [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%