2019
DOI: 10.7554/elife.39702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polygenic adaptation on height is overestimated due to uncorrected stratification in genome-wide association studies

Abstract: Genetic predictions of height differ among human populations and these differences have been interpreted as evidence of polygenic adaptation. These differences were first detected using SNPs genome-wide significantly associated with height, and shown to grow stronger when large numbers of sub-significant SNPs were included, leading to excitement about the prospect of analyzing large fractions of the genome to detect polygenic adaptation for multiple traits. Previous studies of height have been based on SNP eff… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
420
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
420
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 2014 height GWAS, that inflation is reported as the LDSC intercept is 2.09 in [77], indicating considerable inflation; for the 2018 dataset we find σ 2 0 =2.5, while the LD score regression intercept is 2.1116 (se 0.0458). Given the various estimates of inflation and the controversy over population structure in the height data [50,51], it is not clear what results are definitely incorrect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the 2014 height GWAS, that inflation is reported as the LDSC intercept is 2.09 in [77], indicating considerable inflation; for the 2018 dataset we find σ 2 0 =2.5, while the LD score regression intercept is 2.1116 (se 0.0458). Given the various estimates of inflation and the controversy over population structure in the height data [50,51], it is not clear what results are definitely incorrect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For height, we focused on the 2014 GWAS [46], not the more recent 2018 GWAS [49], although we also report below model results for the latter. There are issues pertaining to population structure in the various height GWAS [50,51], and the 2018 GWAS is a combination of GIANT and UKB GWAS, so some caution is warranted in interpreting results for these data.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human height is controlled by more than 500 loci (Wood et al, ), although recent estimates suggest that this number is probably too high since population structure has not been adequately considered (Berg et al, ; Sohail et al ). We choose the following parameter ranges: 0.001–0.01 for the effect sizes (measured in units of the standard deviation, where in the case of human height 1 SD 6.5 cm; Turchin et al, ), s around 0.1 (Turchin et al, ), the number of loci affecting the trait l = 200, and mutation rate of about 10 −5 per generation.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar GWAS meta-analysis was also conducted for cortical thickness, but given the massive expansion of SA in modern humans and only subtle increases in cortical thickness as compared to extant mammalian species 5 , we chose to focus on SA for this study. Association was assessed in 35,660 individuals from 55 cohorts across the lifespan, including data from the UK Biobank 16 (UKBB, N = 9,923). From standard structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain, the ENIGMA consortium automatically measured total SA across the cortex, as well as average bilateral SA for each of 34 cortical regions defined by gyral anatomy 30 .…”
Section: Genome-wide Association To Human Cortical Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 99%