Ecscw 2001
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48019-0_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PolyLens: A Recommender System for Groups of Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
267
0
6

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(281 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
267
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Polylens [16] in movies domain. Or, regarding recommendations of restaurants for groups, Pocket Restaurant Finder [17].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Polylens [16] in movies domain. Or, regarding recommendations of restaurants for groups, Pocket Restaurant Finder [17].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, if for example we selected Marilyn Monroe movies the actor's field would be useless as she is no longer making movies and there would not be any possible comparison between fields. 16 .…”
Section: Content Based Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, recommendation approaches are distinguished between: content-based, that recommend items similar to those the user previously preferred (e.g., [17,13]), collaborative filtering, that recommend items that users with similar preferences liked (e.g., [11,8]) and hybrid, that combine content-based and collaborative ones (e.g., [5]). Several extensions have been proposed, such as employing multi-criteria ratings (e.g., [2]) and defining recommendations for groups (e.g., [4,15,14]). Recently, there are also approaches focusing on enhancing recommendations with further contextual information (e.g., [3,16]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this is the essence of the well-known collaborative recommender systems [2,9,13], where items are recommended to a certain user concerning those of her interests shared with other users or according to opinions, comparatives and ratings of items given by similar users. However, in typical approaches, the comparison between users and items is done globally, in such a way that partial, but strong and useful similarities may be missed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%