to replace flammable liquid electrolytes, much research focus has been devoted to solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) with combined high modulus and ionic conductivity in order to inhibit or retard Li dendrite growth. [3] For example, polyethylene oxide (PEO) has been blended with lithium salt to form SPEs since it has a low T g , high dielectric constant, and complexes well with Li ions. [4] Most SPEs to date have a few orders of magnitude lower conductivity than liquid-based electrolytes; to account for this, many attempts have been made to increase the conductivity while maintaining mechanical properties; however, SPE-based polymer electrolyte membranes (PEMs) typically lack the adequate combination of ionic conductivity and mechanical properties desired for long term or fast cycling in lithium batteries. The main solution for this has been to decouple the bulk electrolyte membrane mechanical and ion transport properties. To this end, block copolymers [3c,5] offer an elegant solution. More recently, mechanical blockades, such as 2D graphene oxide [6] and 1D nanofillers, [7] crosslinked networks, [8] polymerization-induced phase separation, [9] and liquid crystal-containing ion gel [10] have been demonstrated as viable candidates for next generation PEM design. While initial results for all these methods have been promising, each of these candidates brings different obstacles, and much work remains in understanding the underlying mechanisms of dendrite growth and cell failure and optimizing the materials to meet the required combination of properties.This paper reports a series of nanostructured, holographically polymerized PEMs (hPEMs) comprised of poly(ethylene glycol)/bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide lithium (PEG/ LiTFSI) electrolyte and acrylate-thiol-ene crosslinked resin. In holographical polymerization (HP), [11] a photopolymerizable monomer(s) is mixed with a photoinert material to form a homogenous mixture. [12] This prepolymer mixture is exposed to an interference pattern, inducing polymerization in the areas of constructive interference, which then leads to a concentration gradient, driving more monomer into the polymerization zone, simultaneously expelling the photoinert material into the volumes of destructive interference. While the reaction and network formations in these systems are usually inherently