1973
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(73)90120-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymer translational diffusion: 2. Non-theta solutions, polystyrene in butan-2-one

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
7
1
1

Year Published

1974
1974
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the three highest molecular weights reported by these investigators are presented in Figure 8, since they implied in their paper that the data for the lower molecular weights were questionable. The methyl ethyl ketone data of McDonnell and Jamieson and the data of King et al (1973b) for this solvent above a molecular weight of 2 x 105 are reasonably well represented by a value of B slightly greater than 0.5 x cmJ. This value falls between the value of B = 0.76 x loez7 cm3 reported by Berry and Casassa (1970) and the values derived from intrinsic viscosity data and presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Determination Of Kdsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only the three highest molecular weights reported by these investigators are presented in Figure 8, since they implied in their paper that the data for the lower molecular weights were questionable. The methyl ethyl ketone data of McDonnell and Jamieson and the data of King et al (1973b) for this solvent above a molecular weight of 2 x 105 are reasonably well represented by a value of B slightly greater than 0.5 x cmJ. This value falls between the value of B = 0.76 x loez7 cm3 reported by Berry and Casassa (1970) and the values derived from intrinsic viscosity data and presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Determination Of Kdsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Data for the solvents methyl ethyl ketone, toluene, and THF, taken primarily using narrow polystyrene fractions, are included in Figure 5. Lines drawn through the points representing the toluene data of Meyerhoff and Nachtigall (1962) and the methyl ethyl ketone data of King et al (1973b) and of Tsvetkov and Klenin (1958) would be in reasonable agreement with the shapes of the theoretical curves. Furthermore, as is discussed in detail elsewhere (Vrentas and Duda, 1976a), the values of B which fit these diffusivity data are in reasonably good agreement with values of this parameter determined from unrelated experiments, especially when the slow change of D o / ( D o ) e with B for good solvents is considered.…”
Section: Determination Of Do For Nantheta Solutionssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The measured value of D, 6.2(±0.1) x w-s cm 2 s-1 , is in good agreement with the relation between log <D> and log <Mw) obtained by King et a/. 9 Using the Einstein-Stokes formula, the hydrodynamic radius is calculated as 8.8 x 10-6 em. This is 72% of Rg.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The concentration dependence of the diffusion coefficient, D, in the volumefixed frame of reference has been the subject of several experimental studies (25)(26)(27). First it should be noted that hydrodynamic and molecular calculations usually determine diffusion coefficients, Dts), in a reference frame in which macromolecules move relative to the solvent.…”
Section: Diffusion Of Macromoleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First it should be noted that hydrodynamic and molecular calculations usually determine diffusion coefficients, Dts), in a reference frame in which macromolecules move relative to the solvent. The relationship between D~ and D is given by the well-known formula (27)…”
Section: Diffusion Of Macromoleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%