2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2009.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphism of the homologous recombination repair genes RAD51 and XRCC3 in breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, BC survival but not BC risk has been found to be associated with the GSTP-Ile105Val polymorphism (49). The G135C genotype of the RAD51 gene was not associated with susceptibility to BC, which is consistent with previous reports (50,51). In other studies the association of the G135C polymorphism with the development of BC was found to be influenced by BRCA status and age (52)(53)(54).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, BC survival but not BC risk has been found to be associated with the GSTP-Ile105Val polymorphism (49). The G135C genotype of the RAD51 gene was not associated with susceptibility to BC, which is consistent with previous reports (50,51). In other studies the association of the G135C polymorphism with the development of BC was found to be influenced by BRCA status and age (52)(53)(54).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, other literature data were also found (Loizidou et al 2008;Krupa et al 2009;Sobczuk et al 2009). No significant associations were observed between the Thr241Met polymorphism and breast cancer in Cypriot women (Loizidou et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…no reporting of the relevant genotype frequencies, whereas the other [18] was excluded for examining the association between other XRCC3 polymorphisms and premenopausal breast cancer risk). As a result, 19 case-control articles [2,3,5,12,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]] (23 case-control studies, considering that Breast Cancer Association Consortium has more than one studies included) were included in this meta-analysis; 20 case-control studies on non-Chinese subjects (19,575 cases and 21,125 controls) and three case-control studies [3,24,29] on Chinese subjects (1,216 cases and 1,112 controls). Table 1 presents in detail the results of the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%