2002
DOI: 10.1214/aoap/1015961162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial Convergence Rates of Markov Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
151
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although bounds of the form (1) may imply (2) in some scenarios, such an approach may be sub-optimal and lead to a significant loss. This is the case, for example, with certain polynomial kernels yielding (1) with rater(n) ∝ n β with some β > 0 [15]. This guarantees the finiteness of the sum in (2) with a constant rate r(n) = 1 only if β > 1, whereas our results imply (2) also with weaker polynomial rates including the cases β ∈ (0, 1] of [15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Although bounds of the form (1) may imply (2) in some scenarios, such an approach may be sub-optimal and lead to a significant loss. This is the case, for example, with certain polynomial kernels yielding (1) with rater(n) ∝ n β with some β > 0 [15]. This guarantees the finiteness of the sum in (2) with a constant rate r(n) = 1 only if β > 1, whereas our results imply (2) also with weaker polynomial rates including the cases β ∈ (0, 1] of [15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Indeed, choose R to be the Markov kernel of a sub-geometrically ergodic Markov chain converging to a stationary measure π at polynomial speed (for instance the kernels introduced in [JR02]); the limit process will inherit the slow speed of convergence. More precisely, there exist β ≥ 1, a class of functions G and a function W such that…”
Section: Lazier and Lazier Random Walkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of upper to lower bound for this example is n * /n * = 14, 000, 000 / 4, 000, 000 = 3.5 , a fairly small number, indicating fairly tight upper and lower bounds on convergence. In addition to numerical bounds, we can also consider the functional form by which the distance to stationarity decreases as a function of n. While we know that the decrease cannot be geometric in this case, it can still correspond to polynomial ergodicity Moulines, 2000, 2003;Jarner and Roberts, 2002 …”
Section: Example #1: Exponential Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-geometrically ergodic chains, convergence bounds have been studied by Meyn and Tweedie (1993), Moulines (2000, 2003), Jarner and Roberts (2002), and especially by Douc et al (2007), who use hitting times of small sets to provide very general and useful quantitative bounds which are then applied to certain specific examples (including an independence sampler on the unit interval). Compared to the work of Douc et al (2007), our results are less general but are better suited to the specific properties of independence samplers (as illustrated by our closely matching upper and lower bounds in the examples).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%