2020
DOI: 10.1631/fitee.1900430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial robust observer implementation based passive synchronization of nonlinear fractional-order systems with structural disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. (13) presents the integral of absolute error (IAE). We clearly observe that the FISMC is more robust than the ISMC method since the IAE has a lower value when the FISMC method is considered.…”
Section: The Reachability Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. (13) presents the integral of absolute error (IAE). We clearly observe that the FISMC is more robust than the ISMC method since the IAE has a lower value when the FISMC method is considered.…”
Section: The Reachability Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, a certain number of constraints of various kinds (thermal, electrical, mechanical and environmental) can affect the life of the machine by causing failures in the stator and rotor [22,25]. These failures are always present in electromechanical systems and are responsible for huge economic losses, so robust control strategies are required to avoid unexpected shutdowns [13,14]. The study of the induction motor, in the case of control, has become very important due to industrial development, especially for electric drives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LESO performance will worsen if the bandwidth takes an unacceptably high or low value [31]. Optimum values for the controller and LESO bandwidth will provide an effective elimination of exogenic disturbances and tracking performance [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. The side effects of approving large bandwidth values can be summarized as measurement noise potentially degrading output tracking, deterioration of the transient response of the LESO, and the possibility of some unmodelled high-frequency dynamics being activated beyond a certain frequency.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z(q, θ) = K(q − θ) (3) where q, q, q ∈ R n and θ, θ, θ ∈ R n denote the angular position, velocity, and acceleration of the links and motors, respectively. M(q) ∈ R n×n is the positive definite inertia matrix, C(q, q) ∈ R n×n is the centripetal-Coriolis matrix, G(q) ∈ R n is the gravitational of the link dynamics, Z(q, θ) ∈ R n is the elastic torque at flexible joints, and K, J ∈ R n×n are positive definite constant diagonal matrices representing joint stiffness and motor inertia, respectively.…”
Section: Dynamics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is always challenging to design controllers for robotic systems in the presence of uncertainties and/or disturbances, despite the extensive so-called robust control methods, such as robust adaptive control [3], repetitive control [4], back-stepping techniques [5], iterative learning control [6], etc. Among them, sliding mode control [7], with its simplicity in application, insensitivity to parameter variations and disturbances implicit in the input channels and non-model based robustness, remains one of the most effective approaches in handling bounded uncertainties and/or disturbances [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%