1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4524-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We will first recall some facts about Newton polygons (see for instance [1]), that will be required in the proof of Lemma 1.4. So let p be a fixed prime number, and let f (X) = n i=0 a i X i be a polynomial with integer coefficients, a 0 a n = 0.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will first recall some facts about Newton polygons (see for instance [1]), that will be required in the proof of Lemma 1.4. So let p be a fixed prime number, and let f (X) = n i=0 a i X i be a polynomial with integer coefficients, a 0 a n = 0.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On each machine, the jobs are processed in SPT (shortest processing time) order. Let p i[ j] = processing time of the j th shortest job type on machine i, i.e., p i [1] ≤ p i [2] ≤ · · · ≤ p i[g] , x i j = number of jobs of type j to be processed on machine i, x i[ j] = number of jobs of j th shortest job type to be processed on machine i, x i0 = number of dummy jobs to be processed on machine i, and n 0 = (m − 1)n.…”
Section: Unrelated Machine Speedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since S is a matrix of supply constraints, there is exactly one 1 in each column. For each row, d i of D, there are g + 1 consecutive ones corresponding to variables x i[0] , x i [1] , . .…”
Section: Unrelated Machine Speedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of papers have considered the location of the roots of the chromatic polynomial of a graph. Birkhoff and Lewis [7] showed that the chromatic polynomial of any plane triangulation has no roots in the intervals (& , 0), (0, 1), (1,2), and [5, ), and Woodall [22] improved this by showing that in fact there are no roots in (2, 2.546602...) (the latter being the smallest nonintegral real root of the chromatic polynomial of the octahedron). It is well known (see [20]) that no graph has a root of its chromatic polynomial in (& , 0) or (0, 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%