2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-019-02375-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyphosphate fertilizers increased maize (Zea mays L.) P, Fe, Zn, and Mn uptake by decreasing P fixation and mobilizing microelements in calcareous soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 1 , chickpea plants fertigated with Poly-P under well-watered conditions absorbed much more quantities of micronutrient (Fe, Cu, Mn) compared to the Ortho-P and the unfertilized treatments. These findings can be explained by the positive effect of Poly-P fertilizer on micronutrients availability in the soil as revealed by Gao et al 24 , who reported that Poly-P fertilizer had the capacity to chelate micronutrients (Fe, Zn, and Mn), which significantly improved their uptake in maize plants under alkaline soil conditions. However, in our study, we demonstrate that strong chelation of micronutrients by the Poly-P may greatly reduce their availability for plants, especially when the hydrolysis process of the Poly-P fertilizer is impacted due to the low soil moisture content (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 1 , chickpea plants fertigated with Poly-P under well-watered conditions absorbed much more quantities of micronutrient (Fe, Cu, Mn) compared to the Ortho-P and the unfertilized treatments. These findings can be explained by the positive effect of Poly-P fertilizer on micronutrients availability in the soil as revealed by Gao et al 24 , who reported that Poly-P fertilizer had the capacity to chelate micronutrients (Fe, Zn, and Mn), which significantly improved their uptake in maize plants under alkaline soil conditions. However, in our study, we demonstrate that strong chelation of micronutrients by the Poly-P may greatly reduce their availability for plants, especially when the hydrolysis process of the Poly-P fertilizer is impacted due to the low soil moisture content (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The increased P uptake in the Poly-P-I1 treatment was accompanied by significant increases in nutrient uptake (N, K, Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn). These results may be explained by the positive synergy between P, N and K and by the aptitude of Poly-P to chelate and release micronutrients for plant roots 24 , 69 , 70 . However, for the Ortho-P form, our results revealed that chickpea plants kept a stable response in terms of P uptake improvement under all studied water irrigation regimes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few studies have reported that PolyPs efficiency can be attributed to their higher and longer-term P availability during the whole crop growth period [ 9 , 18 – 21 ]. Recently, Gao et al [ 15 ] reported that ammonium PolyP significantly enhanced maize biomass (especially root biomass), P uptake, and P fertilizer use efficiency compared to plants fertilized with ammonium P. It is also reported a positive correlation between Olsen-P, maize dry weight, and P-uptake [ 15 ]. Furthermore, ammonium PolyP application not only had significantly increased P uptake, but also micronutrient availability (e.g., Fe, Mn, and Zn), which accounted for additional agronomic benefits of PolyPs [ 14 , 15 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different P sources (ortho-P vs. poly-P) significantly influenced phosphorus availability and transformation ( McBeath et al, 2005 ; Wang & Chu, 2015 ; Gao et al, 2019 ). Polyphosphates (poly-P) are superior over ortho-P fertilizers ( Hamilton et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may largely be ascribed to its slow release characteristic ( Kulakovskaya, Vagabov & Kulaev, 2012 ; Hamilton, Hilger & Peak, 2016 ). Following this, polyphosphate application significantly increased soil available P ( Gao et al, 2019 ) and improved crop yield ( Holloway et al, 2004 ). However, other studies showed that polyphosphate (ammonium polyphosphate, APP) had no obvious advantage or even less than ortho-P fertilizer (granular monoammonium phosphate, MAP) in increasing soil P availability and crop yield ( Ottman, Thompson & Doerge, 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%