1992
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(92)90012-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

POLYRATE 4: A new version of a computer program for the calculation of chemical reaction rates for polyatomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
256
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 543 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
256
0
Order By: Relevance
“…93 In many respects, this theory is similar to TST with a transmission coefficient based on large-curvature tunneling. 147,236,[260][261][262][346][347][348][349][350][351][352][353] In both cases, the TST rate constant is multiplied by a factor that reflects the "interplay between donor-acceptor configuration and nuclear tunneling". Their general expression for the transition probability takes account of all possible paths averaged over energy 305,307 and in this respect is similar to the large-curvature tunneling coefficient that involves, 260,347,[351][352][353][354] for each energy, a convolution of the probability of a given nuclear configuration and the tunneling probability at that configuration, followed by a Boltzmann average over energies.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…93 In many respects, this theory is similar to TST with a transmission coefficient based on large-curvature tunneling. 147,236,[260][261][262][346][347][348][349][350][351][352][353] In both cases, the TST rate constant is multiplied by a factor that reflects the "interplay between donor-acceptor configuration and nuclear tunneling". Their general expression for the transition probability takes account of all possible paths averaged over energy 305,307 and in this respect is similar to the large-curvature tunneling coefficient that involves, 260,347,[351][352][353][354] for each energy, a convolution of the probability of a given nuclear configuration and the tunneling probability at that configuration, followed by a Boltzmann average over energies.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correct way to account for the probability of reaching the transition state quasiclassically is to calculate a quasiclassical free energy of activation (see section 5). A correct way to account for the extra rate enhancement due to systems that do not reach the transition state quasiclassically but nevertheless react by tunneling through this dividing surface is by performing a Boltzmann average over the distribution of tunneling paths weighted by their tunneling probability, as is done in the more complete approaches 260,305,307,347,351 mentioned above as well as in variational transition state theory with a multidimensional transmission coefficient (section 5).…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations