“…To date,m ultiple routes for producing sulfur-polymer materials directly from waste sulfur have been proposed, including the reaction of thiols with elemental sulfur, [4,5] the reaction of element sulfur with p-diiodobenzene, [6,7] multicomponent polymerizations (MCPs) of sulfur with other molecules, [8,9] sulfur radical transfer and coupling (SRTC) reaction with benzoxazine compounds, [10] and inverse vulcanization of sulfur with vinyl groups. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Among those methods," inverse vulcanisation", coined by Pyun et al in 2013, [11] has gained much attention for its outstanding benefits:s imple,s olvent-free,a nd high utilization of sulfur.I ti sn otable that inverse vulcanised polymers show various advantageous functions,like mercury capture, [12,13] self-healing capability, [17,18] optical application, [19,20] electrochemical properties, [21,22] and antimicrobial properties. [23] However,p oor mechanical properties of these exciting new materials currently limit their wider application and scale of use.A lso,t here is still little literature on the mechanical properties of inverse vulcanized polymers.A ccording to the available reports, [11,17,18,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] most materials show aq uite low strength compared to conventional polymers.T he reported highest stress of this material is 8.69 MPa of copolymer poly(S-DIB), which means that not much force is required to break the polymers.The change of crosslinkers seem to be the mostly reported method used for improving the related mechanical properties.E ither using an ew crosslinker or blending two different crosslinkers,t he rigidity modulus of sulfur-polymers could be modified from high to low,b ut the strength is...…”