1990
DOI: 10.1123/ssj.7.3.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pools, Parlays, and Point Spreads: A Sociological Consideration of the Legalization of Sports Gambling

Abstract: The legalization of sports gambling has recently become a major social policy issue in some North American jurisdictions. Unfortunately, there are few guiding principles to help policymakers in their deliberations. This paper presents a synopsis of the main practical and moral arguments for and against sports gambling. The discussion of the consequences of legalizing sports gambling follows a sociological overview that emphasizes the scope, growth, and appeal of the activity. The concluding section examines th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a sociological perspective, these legal debates about daily fantasy hinged on (a) how much control the individual participant had in making choices or taking actions that might lead to certain outcomes (winning or losing money, for example) and (b) how the governance structures protected or should protect those with limited agency. Whereas previous studies on DFS and gambling examined sports gambling-related social risk (Frey, 1991; Smith, 1990), motivations (Curry & Jiobu, 1995), identity formations and politics (Davis & Duncan, 2006), market activity (Lopez-Gonzalez et al, 2017; Lopez-Gonzalez & Griffiths, 2018), and negative social outcomes (Martin & Nelson, 2014), this case provides an important opportunity to extend analyses of the interactions between state and individual actors. It provides a unique case to rethink and reconceptualize broader social, political, and juridical definitions of human agency within sporting contexts.…”
Section: Daily Fantasy Sports (Dfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a sociological perspective, these legal debates about daily fantasy hinged on (a) how much control the individual participant had in making choices or taking actions that might lead to certain outcomes (winning or losing money, for example) and (b) how the governance structures protected or should protect those with limited agency. Whereas previous studies on DFS and gambling examined sports gambling-related social risk (Frey, 1991; Smith, 1990), motivations (Curry & Jiobu, 1995), identity formations and politics (Davis & Duncan, 2006), market activity (Lopez-Gonzalez et al, 2017; Lopez-Gonzalez & Griffiths, 2018), and negative social outcomes (Martin & Nelson, 2014), this case provides an important opportunity to extend analyses of the interactions between state and individual actors. It provides a unique case to rethink and reconceptualize broader social, political, and juridical definitions of human agency within sporting contexts.…”
Section: Daily Fantasy Sports (Dfs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sports gambling refers to games of predicting and betting on results of domestic and overseas sports league matches, such as soccer, basketball, baseball, and golf, which are popular among the public, where payment is awarded to the people who correctly predict the results [9]. Owing to the internet and the advantages of smart devices, online sports gambling offers the advantage of anonymity and not having to be present at the place of betting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Great Britain, sports gambling is legal and the government simply attempts to mitigate any social harms that result. Since legalization there, expenditures on all forms of gam-bling have declined sharply and the evidence suggests that citizens have generally gambled responsibly (Smith, 1990). There is no reason to expect the citizens of the United States to respond differently if they were given the same freedom of choice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%