2012
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Poppers maculopathy’—an emerging ophthalmic reaction to recreational substance abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports previous findings; a patient with a 12-year history of poppers use demonstrated complete restitution on OCT 6 months after cessation 18. One of the few exceptions to this was a case who had used poppers regularly for years and who showed no improvement at 3 months, objective or subjective, following cessation 12. It would be interesting to know the outcome after a longer period of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This supports previous findings; a patient with a 12-year history of poppers use demonstrated complete restitution on OCT 6 months after cessation 18. One of the few exceptions to this was a case who had used poppers regularly for years and who showed no improvement at 3 months, objective or subjective, following cessation 12. It would be interesting to know the outcome after a longer period of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Case 1 in this series has recently been published. 13 Given the longstanding use of poppers, 1 the question arises as to why maculopathy associated with poppers use has not been recognised until 2010. 7 Up to 2007, isobutyl nitrite was the most commonly used compound in poppers in the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In France, up to 14% of young people under age 18 and 10% of the UK general population reported having already tried poppers [1]. A few cases of retinal toxicity have been reported [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%