2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2012.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Popular ranking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [15], a new approach to the problem of aggregating preferences of multiple agents based on the notion of popular ranking is introduced: a ranking of a set of elements is popular if there is no other permutation of the elements that a majority of the voters prefer. They analyzed the computational complexity and proved it is NP-hard to find a ranking with a majority of preferences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [15], a new approach to the problem of aggregating preferences of multiple agents based on the notion of popular ranking is introduced: a ranking of a set of elements is popular if there is no other permutation of the elements that a majority of the voters prefer. They analyzed the computational complexity and proved it is NP-hard to find a ranking with a majority of preferences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aggregation ranking problem a way of measuring how different two rankings are is required, and distances are the conventional tool to do that. A common approach to this problem is to find a permutation that minimizes the sum of the distances to the voters rankings, where in principle any distance (-like), function on permutations can be used [15]. The most frequently used distance measures among rankings are the Spearman footrule distance and the Kendall τ distance [16]; the Spearman footrule distance between two given rankings is defined as the sum, over all the candidates i of the absolute differences between the ranks of i with respect to the two rankings; the Kendall distance between two rankings is given by the minimum number of pairwise adjacent transpositions needed to transform one ranking into another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the greater is the similarity between the given rankings by the employers, the higher the conflict of interest. As a ranking is a permutation of N values, the similarity between rankings can be expressed using distances between permutations [26,14]. One of the most frequently used distance measures between rankings is the Spearman footrule distance [27].…”
Section: Formalization Of the Problem Of Personnel Selection In A Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rank aggregation is the problem of combining multiple rankings in a single ranking; that is, given a set of N permutations of n elements, to identify the permutation which represents this set in the best way. A common approach to this problem is to find a permutation that minimizes the sum of the distances to each ranking, where in principle any distance(-like) function on permutations can be used [12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another recent work, Zuylen et al. ( 2014 ) consider the problem of finding a popular ranking from a computational viewpoint. In their framework, given a set of alternatives, each member of a set of agents proposes her ideal solution, i.e., individual ranking of the alternatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%