2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population age structure as an indicator for assessing the quality of breeding areas of Common quail (Coturnix coturnix)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During period 2, the NCWRC estimated approximately 2,400 otters were harvested annually, and based on the age distributions, the population appears to be healthy (Sanders et al 2020 a ) with high reproduction and recruitment. The long‐term stable age distribution of harvested otters indicates that habitat and water quality are good (Sanders et al 2020 b ) and that reproduction is stable or increasing (Sulkava et al 2007, Barrett and Leslie 2012, Graser et al 2012, Marvá and San Segundo 2018, Nadal et al 2018). Further, an abundance of young otters in the harvest is indicative of high recruitment and population stability (Rolley 1985, Koons et al 2006, Flynn and Schumacher 2009, Rughetti 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During period 2, the NCWRC estimated approximately 2,400 otters were harvested annually, and based on the age distributions, the population appears to be healthy (Sanders et al 2020 a ) with high reproduction and recruitment. The long‐term stable age distribution of harvested otters indicates that habitat and water quality are good (Sanders et al 2020 b ) and that reproduction is stable or increasing (Sulkava et al 2007, Barrett and Leslie 2012, Graser et al 2012, Marvá and San Segundo 2018, Nadal et al 2018). Further, an abundance of young otters in the harvest is indicative of high recruitment and population stability (Rolley 1985, Koons et al 2006, Flynn and Schumacher 2009, Rughetti 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an old age structure with little recruitment would indicate a population that is not thriving (Browne & Hecnar, 2007), whereas an age structure showing much recruitment would indicate demographic health (Kiss, Hamer, & Voros, 2021). By examining both age structure and environmental or management variation, it may be possible to identify those environments or management strategies that are most optimal for the population (Browne & Hecnar, 2007; Gillespie, 2010; Fisher et al., 2018; Jones et al., 2018; Nadal, Ponz, & Margalida, 2018). Despite the importance of age structure as a predictor and monitor of conservation programs, a review of 148 studies revealed that there is a significant gap in age structure studies (Mehring et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%