2016
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population and phylogenomic decomposition via genotyping‐by‐sequencing in Australian Pelargonium

Abstract: Species delimitation has seen a paradigm shift as increasing accessibility of genomic-scale data enables separation of lineages with convergent morphological traits and the merging of recently diverged ecotypes that have distinguishing characteristics. We inferred the process of lineage formation among Australian species in the widespread and highly variable genus Pelargonium by combining phylogenomic and population genomic analyses along with breeding system studies and character analysis. Phylogenomic analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such species SNPs are identified by using the reference sequence of a different, but closely related species (Maughan et al, 2009), or the de novo assembly of sequencing reads (Catchen et al, 2011(Catchen et al, , 2013. Despite these limitations, GBS and related RADseq approaches have been used for phylogenetic analyses of both closely and distantly related taxa (Ariani et al, 2016;Eaton and Ree, 2013;Harvey et al, 2016;Nicotra et al, 2016) Several software tools were developed for phylogenetic analyses based on biallelic markers. For example, SNAPP (SNP and AFLP Package for Phylogenetic analysis) infers species trees directly from biallelic markers by implementing a full multispecies coalescent model (Bryant et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such species SNPs are identified by using the reference sequence of a different, but closely related species (Maughan et al, 2009), or the de novo assembly of sequencing reads (Catchen et al, 2011(Catchen et al, , 2013. Despite these limitations, GBS and related RADseq approaches have been used for phylogenetic analyses of both closely and distantly related taxa (Ariani et al, 2016;Eaton and Ree, 2013;Harvey et al, 2016;Nicotra et al, 2016) Several software tools were developed for phylogenetic analyses based on biallelic markers. For example, SNAPP (SNP and AFLP Package for Phylogenetic analysis) infers species trees directly from biallelic markers by implementing a full multispecies coalescent model (Bryant et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simulated data, this approach consistently inferred the correct phylogeny, and often with the best fit to the true branch length distribution. In the case of Pelargonium, however, it did not retrieve one of the clades strongly supported by SNAPP (Nicotra et al, 2016), and for Craspedia locus-wise scoring resulted in poorly resolved and poorly supported relationships.…”
Section: Choice Of Scoring Approachmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We generated empirical SNP data used in this study with Genotyping-by-Sequencing (Elshire et al, 2011) as described in detail by Nicotra et al (2016). Briefly, genomic DNA was digested with PstI and ligated to uniquely barcoded sequencing adaptor pairs.…”
Section: Snp Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations