2020
DOI: 10.1017/9781108657099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population and Politics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 717 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these grievances connect with trust because the key image of government in people's lives is a national government consisting of outsiders. People express higher trust the more localized the institution that they are asked about (Gerring and Veenendaal, 2020), partly because the political actors involved are "like us" not "like them, " and expected to be more sympathetic to and knowledgeable about their constituents. Decentralization may thus curb the damaging effects of place-based grievances on national politics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these grievances connect with trust because the key image of government in people's lives is a national government consisting of outsiders. People express higher trust the more localized the institution that they are asked about (Gerring and Veenendaal, 2020), partly because the political actors involved are "like us" not "like them, " and expected to be more sympathetic to and knowledgeable about their constituents. Decentralization may thus curb the damaging effects of place-based grievances on national politics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, at the country level, there is a consistently negative and significant relationship between inter-ethnic marriage and population size, such that more populous countries have lower rates of inter-marriage. This novel finding is possibly driven by the scale effects discussed above (Gerring & Veenendaal, 2020), inasmuch as more populous ethnic groups are more self-reliant and thus their members may interact less with members of other groups. One obvious implication of this finding is that population growth could have a dampening effect on inter-ethnic marriage within Africa; however, this relationship remains a topic for further research.…”
Section: Individual Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, we also observe an inverse correlation between country population size and inter-ethnic marriage, with low levels of inter-ethnic marriage in large countries such as Nigeria (with a population of 196 million people in 2018) and Kenya (44.9 million) and higher levels of inter-ethnic marriage in smaller countries such as Gabon (1.6 million) and Congo-Brazzaville (4.2 million). The theoretical basis for this correlation is that increasing scale does not necessarily lead to more ethnic fractionalization but could instead lead to a decline in social cohesion, inasmuch as each ethnic group becomes large enough that its members need rely less upon members of other groups for resources (Gerring & Veenendaal, 2020).…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaving Parsons’ functionalist assumption aside, three specific mechanisms can be imagined to explain the link between size and clientelism (see Gerring and Veenendaal, in press). In the first place, small settings have higher levels of social intimacy and cohesion, and politicians and citizens are likely to know and interact with each other in multiple social roles (Ott, 2000; Tsai, 2007; Veenendaal, 2014; Wood, 1967).…”
Section: Mechanisms and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%