2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population balances combined with Computational Fluid Dynamics: A modeling approach for dispersive mixing in a high pressure homogenizer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…i j i j T 3 (12) For the inertial subrange, particles are bigger than the smallest eddy and the aggregation rate is expressed using Abrahamson's model 55…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…i j i j T 3 (12) For the inertial subrange, particles are bigger than the smallest eddy and the aggregation rate is expressed using Abrahamson's model 55…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of computer technology and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), numerical simulation has become an effective means of fluid mechanics. The CFD approach coupled population balance model (PBM) was employed to comprehensively investigate local droplet breakage and coalescence performance in the liquid–liquid two-phase mixing process. Jaworski et al used the quadrature method of moments to solve the transport equations for the moments of the droplet size distribution (DSD) and studied turbulent droplet breakage in the KSM. A PBM utilizing the phenomenological model was developed and used to assess its ability to accurately simulate the liquid–liquid contacting performance achieved in screen-type static mixers where nearly isotropic turbulent plug flow conditions prevail .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models were recently applied to systems with non-uniform spatial energy and turbulence dissipation, such as high pressure homogenizers [24,9,25,26]. In this context, multi-scale modeling has also been considered in such non-uniform systems, by coupling computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations with the PBE model in order to investigate local droplet breakage and coalescence [27,28,29,30]. However, in static mixers, only few such studies can be reported.…”
Section: Fundamental Population Balance Equation-based Models Have Extensively Been Investigated In Recent Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population balance equation (PBE) provides an effective approach for modeling the DSDs due to droplet coalescence and breakage and has been applied to modeling emulsification in HPHs in some studies. , Among these, Soon et al, Raikar et al., ,, Vankova et al., Tcholakova et al, and Becker et al only considered droplet breakage based on the assumption of negligible droplet coalescence for low dispersed holdup and high emulsifier concentration. Maindarkar et al and Dubbelboer et al further took account of droplet coalescence. Håkansson et al ,, and Maindarkar et al , included droplet coalescence and breakage as well as emulsifier adsorption in their models to highlight the effects of emulsifier type and concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter is therefore critical and used in PBE as an input parameter for DSD prediction. In many studies, it was generally assumed that all energy was dissipated through turbulence, and then the magnitude of turbulence dissipation rate can be determined through empirical correlations and operating conditions. , , Other researchers estimated the mean effective turbulent dissipation rate from computational fluid dynamics (CFD). , Even if such mean value is more accurate than that obtained from empirical correlations, this method is not capable of well estimating the droplet coalescence and breakage rates, since these rates are nonlinearly dependent on the turbulent dissipation rate which is spatially nonuniform. In other words, the space-averaged coalescence or breakage rates are not equivalent to the rates calculated with the mean turbulent dissipation rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%