1999
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/92.2.243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Cytogenetic Evidence for Sibling Species in Anopheles annularis (Diptera: Culicidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we sequenced the rDNA ITS2 and D3 of A. annularis species collected from four different regions of India and found two types of sequences. Distribution of these two sequences among the specimens analyzed was similar to that reported by Atrie et al (1999) where they have shown the predominance of species A. They have also reported that in Assam, only species A was present, while both species A and B were present in Uttar Pradesh.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we sequenced the rDNA ITS2 and D3 of A. annularis species collected from four different regions of India and found two types of sequences. Distribution of these two sequences among the specimens analyzed was similar to that reported by Atrie et al (1999) where they have shown the predominance of species A. They have also reported that in Assam, only species A was present, while both species A and B were present in Uttar Pradesh.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Similarly, we have found that majority of our specimens (161 of 169, i.e., 95.26%) contained one type of sequence, while the remaining 8 (4.73%) contained the other type (Table 1). Based on the distribution pattern and presence of species B in Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh), we have categorized our specimens in two categories as described by Atrie et al (1999). Molecular variations between two cryptic species of the Annularis complex were observed both at the ITS2 and D3 levels ( Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations