2008
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population density and sex do not influence fine-scale natal dispersal in roe deer

Abstract: It is commonly assumed that the propensity to disperse and the dispersal distance of mammals should increase with increasing density and be greater among males than among females. However, most empirical evidence, especially on large mammals, has focused on highly polygynous and dimorphic species displaying female-defence mating tactics. We tested these predictions on roe deer, a weakly polygynous species of large herbivore exhibiting a resource-defence mating tactic at a fine spatial scale. Using three long-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, dispersal might be reduced with increasing fragmentation when suitable habitat patches are surrounded by a hostile matrix (barriers, urbanised areas, habitats with increased predation risk) (Sheperd and Swihart 1995). When matrix habitats are not hostile and do not reduce movements of relatively mobile species, different degrees of fragmentation will have little effect on dispersal behaviour and distances (Bakker and Van Vuren 2004;Gaillard et al 2008). This was probably the case in our study, where suitable woodland patches were interspersed with farm-and cropland, isolated farms, houses with gardens and rural villages, all habitats that apparently did not reduce dispersal movements of red squirrels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, dispersal might be reduced with increasing fragmentation when suitable habitat patches are surrounded by a hostile matrix (barriers, urbanised areas, habitats with increased predation risk) (Sheperd and Swihart 1995). When matrix habitats are not hostile and do not reduce movements of relatively mobile species, different degrees of fragmentation will have little effect on dispersal behaviour and distances (Bakker and Van Vuren 2004;Gaillard et al 2008). This was probably the case in our study, where suitable woodland patches were interspersed with farm-and cropland, isolated farms, houses with gardens and rural villages, all habitats that apparently did not reduce dispersal movements of red squirrels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…on red deer [8][10], on wild boar [11], on brush-tailed rock-wallaby [2], on common vole [12]), and much less is known about the genetic structure of solitary species (but see [6] on brown bears, [13] on a rodent: talar tuco-tuco, [14] on Canadian lynx). Contrary to most mammals studied so far, the European roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus ), living alone or in small family groups, deviates from this general pattern, exhibiting a low level of polygyny [15] and no between-sex differences in natal dispersal [16], [17]. Roe deer thus offers a unique opportunity to test whether social structure and sex-biased dispersal drive fine-scale genetic structure among large mammalian herbivores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This was partly because the most frequently used marking site was also a hot spot for hunting, but also because coordinates of recovery locations were recorded as identical with the coordinates of the marking site for animals shot in the immediate surroundings of this site. We divided the recoveries into two distance categories as recommended by Bennets et al (2001; also done by Gaillard et al 2008). We chose the threshold distance as the median diameter of annual 95 per cent home ranges in seasonally migrating female red deer in another study area at the west coast of Norway (8.7 km; nZ24; unpublished GPS data).…”
Section: (D) Population Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%