1996
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.1996.9516720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population differences in the reproductive biology ofEvechinus chloroticus(Echinoidea: Echinometridae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an equal sex ratio, no significant differences in male and female gonad indices, and an annual reproductive cycle (see review : Barker 2001). Similarly, the cellular processes during gametogenesis and high interindividual gametogenic variability are generally consistent with those previously described for E. chloroticus (Dix 1970;Walker 1982;McShane et al 1996;Brewin et al 2000) and other temperate echinoids with an annual gametogenic cycle (Byrne 1990;see review: Pearse & Cameron 1991;Meidel & Scheibling 1998). Timing of gametogenesis was synchronous between males and females at Causet Cove and Espinosa Point.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…There is an equal sex ratio, no significant differences in male and female gonad indices, and an annual reproductive cycle (see review : Barker 2001). Similarly, the cellular processes during gametogenesis and high interindividual gametogenic variability are generally consistent with those previously described for E. chloroticus (Dix 1970;Walker 1982;McShane et al 1996;Brewin et al 2000) and other temperate echinoids with an annual gametogenic cycle (Byrne 1990;see review: Pearse & Cameron 1991;Meidel & Scheibling 1998). Timing of gametogenesis was synchronous between males and females at Causet Cove and Espinosa Point.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The consistently low values of the gonadal index in the arms of the fjord indicate low gamete production. Spatial patterns in the per-capita gonad weight are consistent with an energetic influence on both growth and gonad production among study sites (Thompson 1982, Andrew 1986, McShane et al 1996. The sites where sea urchins grow to large sizes have an average per capita gonad weight of 47.86 g, almost 2 and a half times the average of 19.83 g for the other sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Mean ± SE (and range) urchin test diameters and wet weights were 75.6 ± 1.2 mm (57-90 mm) and 93.8 ± 0.5 mm (88-101 mm), and 174.8 ± 7.9 g (69-226 g) and 315 ± 5.6 g (256-393 g) for the small and large size classes, respectively. These size classes represented a compromise between comparing urchins or reasonable size difference whilst being able to collect sufficient numbers of individuals within general reproductive size range (*50-130 mm, McShane et al 1996). Urchins within these size classes were then randomly allocated within two dietary treatments (NIWA and NIFA) as follows:…”
Section: Experimental Animals and Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%