2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-016-1467-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population distribution, host-switching, and chemical sensing in the symbiotic shrimp Lysmata pederseni: implications for its mating system in a changing reef seascape

Abstract: Lysmata pederseni, a protandric simultaneously hermaphroditic shrimp that inhabits the tube sponge Callyspongia vaginalis, is monogamous in the central and southeastern Caribbean Sea. We tested the null hypothesis of monogamy in a northern Caribbean population. In the Florida Keys, shrimps did not inhabit host individuals in pairs with a frequency greater than expected by chance alone. Hermaphrodites inhabited sponges solitarily and often brooded embryos. Hermaphrodites do not store sperm and need to be insemi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dichotomous keys either based on morphological traits or color patterns herein developed aim to support future ecological studies in the south-western Atlantic Ocean. Only a few in situ studies has explored the ecology of the genus Lysmata in the region although most species are often observed by scuba divers ( Baeza et al, 2016 ). The genus Lysmata exhibits remarkable disparity in terms of ecology, social behavior, and mating systems ( Chace, 1997 ; Rhyne & Lin, 2006 ; Baeza & Anker, 2008 ; Baeza et al, 2009 ; Baeza, 2010 ; Laubenheimer & Rhyne, 2010 ; Rhyne, Calado & Dos Santos, 2012 ; Baeza & Fuentes, 2013 ; Giraldes, Coelho Filho & Smyth, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dichotomous keys either based on morphological traits or color patterns herein developed aim to support future ecological studies in the south-western Atlantic Ocean. Only a few in situ studies has explored the ecology of the genus Lysmata in the region although most species are often observed by scuba divers ( Baeza et al, 2016 ). The genus Lysmata exhibits remarkable disparity in terms of ecology, social behavior, and mating systems ( Chace, 1997 ; Rhyne & Lin, 2006 ; Baeza & Anker, 2008 ; Baeza et al, 2009 ; Baeza, 2010 ; Laubenheimer & Rhyne, 2010 ; Rhyne, Calado & Dos Santos, 2012 ; Baeza & Fuentes, 2013 ; Giraldes, Coelho Filho & Smyth, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these species, individuals consistently mature and reproduce initially as males and later in life, after attaining female function, turn to functional simultaneous hermaphrodites. Protandric simultaneous hermaphroditism has been experimentally confirmed in a polychaete worm (Premoli and Sella, 1995), a land snail (Tomiyama, 1996), a tunicate (Manriquez and Castilla, 2005), a symbiotic barnacle (Crisp, 1983) and marine shrimps belonging to the genera Lysmata, Exhippolysmata, and Parhippolyte (Baeza, 2009(Baeza, , 2013Braga et al, 2009;Baeza et al, 2016a). Protandric simultaneous hermaphroditism is also suspected in other taxa [e.g., fish, snails, barnacles (Ghiselin, 1969(Ghiselin, , 1974Fischer, 1981;Charnov, 1982Charnov, , 1987Policansky, 1982;Crisp, 1983;Michiels, 1998;Chaine and Angeloni, 2005)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Lysmata seticaudata (Risso 1816) (d'Udekem d'Acoz 2002) and Lysmata californica (Stimpson 1866) (Bauer and Newman 2004)) to those that live in breeding pairs in low densities (e.g. Lysmata grabhami (Gordon 1935) (Wirtz 1997) and Lysmata amboinensis (De Man 1888) (Fiedler 1998)); (2) the confirmation of protandric simultaneous hermaphroditism (PSH) in all species studied (Bauer 2006;Baeza et al 2009;Baeza 2013) with an early male-phase; (3) a varied sociobiology related to the adoption of different mating systems (monogamous or promiscuous, Baeza 2010; Baeza et al 2016) and other aspects of reproductive biology, such as brood size (number of eggs per brood) and frequency of spawning (interspawn interval in days) (Bauer 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%