2020
DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2020.1708442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population distribution over time: modelling local spatial dependence with a CAR process

Abstract: The effectiveness of local spatial dependence in shaping the population density distribution is investigated. Individual location preferences are modelled by considering the status-related features of a given spatial unit and its neighbours as well as local random spatial dependence. The novelty is framing such a dependence through conditionally autoregressive (CAR) census random effects that are added to a spatially lagged explanatory variable X (SLX) setting. The results not only confirm that controlling for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various contributions in the literature point to the relevance of the economic status of a neighborhood in making such a decision, together with other social features such as education level, labor skills, or individuals belonging to the same ethnic group and living in the same spatial unit (Duranton and Puga 2015). Within this body of work, Epifani and Nicolini (2013) and Epifani et al (2020) develop a probabilistic approach (applicable to different spatial scales, namely either urban or regional levels) to assess the determinants for population density distribution. They approximate individual preferences relying on features that define neighborhood status (following Rosenthal and Ross 2015), as well as accessibility, intended as individuals' ease of access to amenities or other facilities in which they are interested.…”
Section: Framework Of Analysis and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various contributions in the literature point to the relevance of the economic status of a neighborhood in making such a decision, together with other social features such as education level, labor skills, or individuals belonging to the same ethnic group and living in the same spatial unit (Duranton and Puga 2015). Within this body of work, Epifani and Nicolini (2013) and Epifani et al (2020) develop a probabilistic approach (applicable to different spatial scales, namely either urban or regional levels) to assess the determinants for population density distribution. They approximate individual preferences relying on features that define neighborhood status (following Rosenthal and Ross 2015), as well as accessibility, intended as individuals' ease of access to amenities or other facilities in which they are interested.…”
Section: Framework Of Analysis and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in [48], we suppose the existence of a potential impact of social interactions-in the form of local spatial spillovers-on the probability of a municipality of having mixed marriages. This spatial version of ZIP model takes the form of a cross-sectional spatially lagged SLX model ( [49][50][51]). It is an augmented model which incorporates the spatial lags of the explanatory variables in the expressions of equation ( 3) as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in [50], we suppose the existence of a potential impact of social interactions-in the form of local spatial spillovers-on the probability of a municipality of having mixed marriages. This spatial version of ZIP model takes the form of a cross-sectional spatially lagged SLX model [51][52][53]. It is an augmented model which incorporates the spatial lags of the explanatory variables in the expressions of Equation (3) as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%