2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf03192479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population dynamics ofClethrionomys glareolus andApodemus flavicollis: seasonal components of density dependence and density independence

Abstract: Population dynamics of Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis: seasonal components of density dependence and density independence. [In: Theriology at the turn of a new century. J. Gliwicz, ed]. Acta Theriologica 47, Suppl. 1: 39-67.Using long-term data on two forest rodent species [the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780) and the yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis (Melchior, 1834)] from the Bia³owie¿a Primeval Forest (E Poland), we decompose the annual density-dependent and densit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
72
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
3
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other factors may also vary with meteorological conditions and influence T. gondii life cycle. In particular, the population dynamics of rodents is affected by climate-driven vegetation growth [84]. Specifically, when winter is mild, survival is high and rodent populations comprise many adult or old individuals, which are the age groups most often infected.…”
Section: Temporal Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other factors may also vary with meteorological conditions and influence T. gondii life cycle. In particular, the population dynamics of rodents is affected by climate-driven vegetation growth [84]. Specifically, when winter is mild, survival is high and rodent populations comprise many adult or old individuals, which are the age groups most often infected.…”
Section: Temporal Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our focus on the seasonal density-dependent structure is similar, the approach taken in this paper is different from that of Hansen et al (1999), Merritt et al (2001) and Stenseth et al (2002), who used data on both spring and autumn densities to assess the seasonal densitydependent structure of the same species. Whereas Hansen et al (1999) and Stenseth et al (2002) made the tacit assumption of the spring and autumn sampling coinciding with the termination of the winter and the summer seasons, we do in this study let the annual density-dependent structure 'tell us' how the year is most appropriately to be divided into two phases (which we will call 'seasons' and refer to as 'summer' and 'winter').…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas Hansen et al (1999) and Stenseth et al (2002) made the tacit assumption of the spring and autumn sampling coinciding with the termination of the winter and the summer seasons, we do in this study let the annual density-dependent structure 'tell us' how the year is most appropriately to be divided into two phases (which we will call 'seasons' and refer to as 'summer' and 'winter').…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species-related differences in the isotopic signatures of the two dominant rodent species may be explained by diet differences and microhabitat use, both supporting coexistence (Stenseth et al, 2002;Cassaing et al, 2013). Previous experience with livetrapping and marking of A. flavicollis in the cormorant colony (Jasiulionis, unpubl.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%