1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02432124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population genetics of STR loci in Caucasians

Abstract: STR loci are becoming increasingly important in forensic casework. In order to be used fairly and efficiently, the population genetics of these loci must be investigated and the implications for forensic inference assessed. A key population genetics parameter is the "coancestry coefficient", or FST, which is the correlation between two genes sampled from distinct individuals within a subpopulation. We present analyses of STR data, at geographic scales which range from national to regional, from the UK and othe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike frequentist methods, BayeScan takes into account heterogeneous rates of migration between populations, corresponding to a situation likely to occur in natural populations. A Bayesian approach is used to estimate the posterior probabilities of two alternative models estimating the locus-population-specific F ST as described by Balding et al (1996): a "neutral model" including only population effects (b j ) and thus accounting only for demographic effects and a "selection model" including both population effects (b j ) and locus effects (a i ) indicative of selection. A negative a i value indicates balancing selection whereas a positive a i value indicates directional selection.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike frequentist methods, BayeScan takes into account heterogeneous rates of migration between populations, corresponding to a situation likely to occur in natural populations. A Bayesian approach is used to estimate the posterior probabilities of two alternative models estimating the locus-population-specific F ST as described by Balding et al (1996): a "neutral model" including only population effects (b j ) and thus accounting only for demographic effects and a "selection model" including both population effects (b j ) and locus effects (a i ) indicative of selection. A negative a i value indicates balancing selection whereas a positive a i value indicates directional selection.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure would, however, be appropriate only if F were constant across loci and we will see (Fig. 1) that such an hypothesis is not supported by the data (see also Balding et a!., 1996). Possible reasons include differing mutation rates or selection processes at distinct loci.…”
Section: Combining In Formationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In forensic casework, this is rarely the case and allele proportion estimates are used from databases covering a large, heterogeneous population [11]. Extensions of this work to allow for uncertainties in allele frequencies and the coancestry coefficient will also be discussed in Section 5.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%