2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-012-1906-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of drug-induced adverse effects of a novel homocamptothecin analog, elomotecan (BN80927), in a Phase I dose finding study in patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract: The pharmacokinetic parameters and the toxicity pattern of elomotecan suggest that this novel homocamptothecin analog should be further explored in the clinical setting using a dose of 60 mg administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, once every 3 weeks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…77 The resulting synthetic compounds are known as homocamptothecins. 78 The most promising of these compounds are elomotecan (BN80927) 79,80 and diflomotecan (BN80915), 81,82 which have been tested in clinical trials for colon, breast, prostate, and lung cancer.…”
Section: Figure 716mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…77 The resulting synthetic compounds are known as homocamptothecins. 78 The most promising of these compounds are elomotecan (BN80927) 79,80 and diflomotecan (BN80915), 81,82 which have been tested in clinical trials for colon, breast, prostate, and lung cancer.…”
Section: Figure 716mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are often quantified using grades, because objective direct measurement is not always possible. In these cases, NLME models can use discrete data models, for example, logistic regression/ proportional odds, in which the probability of a certain grade is correlated with a measure of exposure (e.g., diarrhea grades [68] and asthenia, nausea, and vomiting grades [69]). Additionally, Markov models can be used if the toxicity grades between the nearby time points are correlated, which Hénin et al illustrated for hand-and-foot syndrome [70].…”
Section: Adverse Event Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitored event types that had not Establishing the relationship between PK and BMK and/or TS dynamics (extensively reviewed in [23,29,36,37] Establishing the relationship between different (model-based) predictors and OS and PFS (Table 1) Establishing the relationship between drug exposure and toxicity in Dose optimization [77] PBPK [8][9][10] Hematological toxicities [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] CT measurement optimization [27] TMDD [12][13][14][15][16] Nonhematological toxicities [65][66][67][68][69][70] Drug selection [17] Abbreviations: BMK, biomarker; CT, computed tomography; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression free survival; PBPK, physiologically based pharmacokinetic model; PK, pharmacokinetics; TMDD, target-mediated drug disposition; TS, tumor size.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several examples in the anesthetic (Gambus and Troconiz, 2015) and non-anesthetic (Troconiz et al, 2012) (Sheiner, 1994; Soto et al., 2011) literature have shown the utility of these approaches; the use of the population approach for mathematical modeling extends beyond clinical pharmacology (Owen and Fiedler-Kelly, 2014; Pinheiro and Bates, 2000). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%